Making Local Courts Work: The Judicial Recentralization Reform and Local Protectionism in China

Despite extensive comparative research on the relationship between government and courts, the independence and administration of local judiciaries remain understudied. Is a decentralized system—where local governments appoint judges and finance court budgets—more conducive to court autonomy than a centralized system that allows higher-level governments to control local judiciaries? We examine a reform in China that gradually recentralizes control over local courts. Using a difference-in-differences design with a unique dataset of lawsuits from listed firms (2012–2018), we find that recentralization diminishes local officials’ ability to interfere with court decision-making and reduces advantages for local litigants. These results suggest that recentralization can help insulate courts from government influence and enhance judicial independence under certain conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734246
Citations
9
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Local Courts Work: The Judicial Recentralization Reform and Local Protectionism in China

Zhenhuan Lei, Yishuang Li
9 citations
The Journal of Politics
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
17.85
article

Making Local Courts Work: The Judicial Recentralization Reform and Local Protectionism in China

Zhenhuan Lei, Yishuang Li
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Despite extensive comparative research on the relationship between government and courts, the independence and administration of local judiciaries remain understudied. Is a decentralized system—where local governments appoint judges and finance court budgets—more conducive to court autonomy than a centralized system that allows higher-level governments to control local judiciaries? We examine a reform in China that gradually recentralizes control over local courts. Using a difference-in-differences design with a unique dataset of lawsuits from listed firms (2012–2018), we find that recentralization diminishes local officials’ ability to interfere with court decision-making and reduces advantages for local litigants. These results suggest that recentralization can help insulate courts from government influence and enhance judicial independence under certain conditions.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(4)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.