16 Safety and feasibility of adenosine stress cardiac MRI in heart transplant recipients

<h3>Introduction</h3> Stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is recommended in international guidelines in class I in patients with known or suspected CAD. Patients undergoing cardiac transplantation (OHT) are at risk of developing cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Adenosine is relatively contraindicated after transplantation because of a presumed risk of atrioventricular block in denervated hearts. We sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of adenosine stress CMR in patients with OHT and suspected CAV. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> In an outpatient cohort study, we measured the incidence of adverse effects of adenosine stress CMR in consecutive OHT recipients undergoing quantitative stress perfusion CMR for suspected CAV. We additionally stratified patients based on presence of significant CAV (grades 2–3 versus 0–1) on either invasive or computed tomography coronary angiography to evaluate potential CMR biomarkers of significant coronary disease in this population. <h3>Results</h3> We identified 50 adenosine stress CMR studies performed in 45 individual patients at a median of 19 years after transplantation (IQR 4.7–24.4); 9% of studies were conducted within the first year post-transplantation. No life-threatening adverse events, brief or prolonged atrioventricular block or other arrythmias occurred after adenosine infusion. Significant myocardial ischemia (≥ 1.5 segments) was reported in 17% of patients. When stratified by CAV severity, stress MBF index, but not inducible ischemia on visual inspection, was found to significantly differentiate patients with severe CAV from those without significant coronary disease (ANOVA p = 0.028). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Adenosine stress perfusion CMR is safe and feasible in OHT recipients. Quantitative measurement of stress MBF index may represent a promising marker of coronary disease with incremental value over qualitative assessment of ischemia, and should be evaluated in future studies. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-bscmr-19.10
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

16 Safety and feasibility of adenosine stress cardiac MRI in heart transplant recipients

Fabrizio Ricci, Maria Perotto, Peter Kellman, Maria Cristina Procopio et al.
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

16 Safety and feasibility of adenosine stress cardiac MRI in heart transplant recipients

Fabrizio Ricci, Maria Perotto, Peter Kellman, Maria Cristina Procopio, Sabina Gallina, Joyce Wong, Nikolaos Miaris, Giulia La Vecchia, Roberto Licordari, Isabella Leo, Chiara Bucciarelli‐Ducci, Giandomenico Bisaccia
article en

Abstract

<h3>Introduction</h3> Stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is recommended in international guidelines in class I in patients with known or suspected CAD. Patients undergoing cardiac transplantation (OHT) are at risk of developing cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Adenosine is relatively contraindicated after transplantation because of a presumed risk of atrioventricular block in denervated hearts. We sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of adenosine stress CMR in patients with OHT and suspected CAV. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> In an outpatient cohort study, we measured the incidence of adverse effects of adenosine stress CMR in consecutive OHT recipients undergoing quantitative stress perfusion CMR for suspected CAV. We additionally stratified patients based on presence of significant CAV (grades 2–3 versus 0–1) on either invasive or computed tomography coronary angiography to evaluate potential CMR biomarkers of significant coronary disease in this population. <h3>Results</h3> We identified 50 adenosine stress CMR studies performed in 45 individual patients at a median of 19 years after transplantation (IQR 4.7–24.4); 9% of studies were conducted within the first year post-transplantation. No life-threatening adverse events, brief or prolonged atrioventricular block or other arrythmias occurred after adenosine infusion. Significant myocardial ischemia (≥ 1.5 segments) was reported in 17% of patients. When stratified by CAV severity, stress MBF index, but not inducible ischemia on visual inspection, was found to significantly differentiate patients with severe CAV from those without significant coronary disease (ANOVA p = 0.028). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Adenosine stress perfusion CMR is safe and feasible in OHT recipients. Quantitative measurement of stress MBF index may represent a promising marker of coronary disease with incremental value over qualitative assessment of ischemia, and should be evaluated in future studies. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> None

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Messina (IT), National Institutes of Health (US), University of Trieste (IT), King's College London (GB), Harefield Hospital (GB), Magna Graecia University (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US), King's College School (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, University of Leicester, King's College London, University College London, University of Oxford, University of Leeds, University of Glasgow, University of Aberdeen, Università degli Studi G. d'Annunzio Chieti - Pescara, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.