Calibrating hands-on experience and manual know-how in anatomical dissection

Research on instruction in manual skills training has traditionally focused on the practices for displaying understandings that are conveyed via talk or embodied demonstration. Know-how, or the understanding needed for performing a manual skill, however, is necessarily grounded in the practitioner’s sensorial experience of their movements, the tools they use, and the materials they manipulate. As such, sensorial touch is essential to the learning of manual skills, and participants require means for making their sensory experience accessible to one another for coordinating instruction. Building on previous work in practical skills training, this study investigates instructional interactions in cadaveric workshops. Focusing on interactions where a) instructors demonstrate manual actions and articulate tactile experiences, b) trainees attempt to explore anatomical structures, and c) instructors evaluate those attempts, we analyse the embodied and material resources that participants use for making tactile experience accessible, assessable, and thereby instructable in interaction, and how the instruction are consequently organized in pursuing that end. • Effective instruction relies on members’ methods for displaying, assessing, and ratifying understandings in interaction. • This presents challenges for manual skills training as understanding, or know-how, is predicated on sensorial experience. • Participants make use of embodied and material practices for revealing their tactile perception of the work for instruction. • These tactile practices provide members means for monitoring discrepancies in how they perceive objects, actions, etc.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language & Communication
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.11.004
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibrating hands-on experience and manual know-how in anatomical dissection

Michael Sean Smith, Oskar Lindwall
2 citations
Language & Communication
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
1.70
article

Calibrating hands-on experience and manual know-how in anatomical dissection

Michael Sean Smith, Oskar Lindwall
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Research on instruction in manual skills training has traditionally focused on the practices for displaying understandings that are conveyed via talk or embodied demonstration. Know-how, or the understanding needed for performing a manual skill, however, is necessarily grounded in the practitioner’s sensorial experience of their movements, the tools they use, and the materials they manipulate. As such, sensorial touch is essential to the learning of manual skills, and participants require means for making their sensory experience accessible to one another for coordinating instruction. Building on previous work in practical skills training, this study investigates instructional interactions in cadaveric workshops. Focusing on interactions where a) instructors demonstrate manual actions and articulate tactile experiences, b) trainees attempt to explore anatomical structures, and c) instructors evaluate those attempts, we analyse the embodied and material resources that participants use for making tactile experience accessible, assessable, and thereby instructable in interaction, and how the instruction are consequently organized in pursuing that end. • Effective instruction relies on members’ methods for displaying, assessing, and ratifying understandings in interaction. • This presents challenges for manual skills training as understanding, or know-how, is predicated on sensorial experience. • Participants make use of embodied and material practices for revealing their tactile perception of the work for instruction. • These tactile practices provide members means for monitoring discrepancies in how they perceive objects, actions, etc.

Language & CommunicationVol. 100
Linköping University (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Calibrating hands-on experience and manual know-how in anatomical dissection — Michael Sean Smith, Oskar Lindwall · Language & Communication (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS