Validity of Urine Specific Gravity to Determine Hydration Status in NCAA Division I Male and Female Soccer Players

ABSTRACT Introduction Urine specific gravity (USG) is commonly used for rapid determination of hydration status. However, it may not reflect true hydration status when compared to serum osmolality (S osm ). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the agreement between hydration status measured by USG and S osm in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I soccer players. Methods Sixty-four NCAA Division I soccer players ( n = 31 female) participated in the study. Fasting blood draws occurred in the morning at six timepoints for females and three timepoints for males. Repeated-measures correlations were used to assess relationships between USG and S osm ( α = 0.05). Results Mean S osm was 287.60 ± 4.89 mOsm·kg −1 and mean USG was 1.024 ± 0.006. There was no significant correlation found between S osm and USG in all subjects ( r = −0.06, P = 0.36). Mean S osm in females was 286.54 ± 5.24 mOsm·kg −1 , and mean USG was 1.024 ± 0.006. In females, there was no significant correlation between S osm and USG ( r = −0.12, P = 0.16). Mean S osm in males was 289.35 ± 5.57 mOsm·kg −1 , and mean USG was 1.027 ± 0.031. In males, there was no significant correlation between S osm and USG ( r = 0.11, P = 0.42). Mean S osm in females was significantly lower than in men ( P = 0.04), but no significant differences were found between sexes for USG ( P = 0.09). When assessed for sensitivity, females and males received scores of 78.79% and 83.02%, respectively, whereas the general sensitivity of all subjects was 81.40%. Assessment of specificity revealed that females and males received scores of 19.46% and 28.13%, respectively, whereas the general specificity of all subjects was 20.99%. Conclusion The present study demonstrates a discordance between USG and S osm . Although it lacked specificity in classifying euhydration, USG tended to classify an individual as hypohydrated compared to S osm . Because USG may falsely classify an athlete as hypohydrated, additional measures of hydration status should be taken to avoid overhydration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000281
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of Urine Specific Gravity to Determine Hydration Status in NCAA Division I Male and Female Soccer Players

Blaine S. Lints, Bridget A. McFadden, Gianna F. Mastrofini, Sten O. Stray-Gundersen et al.
Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Validity of Urine Specific Gravity to Determine Hydration Status in NCAA Division I Male and Female Soccer Players

Blaine S. Lints, Bridget A. McFadden, Gianna F. Mastrofini, Sten O. Stray-Gundersen, Shawn M. Arent, Alan Walker, Alexa J. Chandler, Ryan M. Argetsinger
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Urine specific gravity (USG) is commonly used for rapid determination of hydration status. However, it may not reflect true hydration status when compared to serum osmolality (S osm ). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the agreement between hydration status measured by USG and S osm in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I soccer players. Methods Sixty-four NCAA Division I soccer players ( n = 31 female) participated in the study. Fasting blood draws occurred in the morning at six timepoints for females and three timepoints for males. Repeated-measures correlations were used to assess relationships between USG and S osm ( α = 0.05). Results Mean S osm was 287.60 ± 4.89 mOsm·kg −1 and mean USG was 1.024 ± 0.006. There was no significant correlation found between S osm and USG in all subjects ( r = −0.06, P = 0.36). Mean S osm in females was 286.54 ± 5.24 mOsm·kg −1 , and mean USG was 1.024 ± 0.006. In females, there was no significant correlation between S osm and USG ( r = −0.12, P = 0.16). Mean S osm in males was 289.35 ± 5.57 mOsm·kg −1 , and mean USG was 1.027 ± 0.031. In males, there was no significant correlation between S osm and USG ( r = 0.11, P = 0.42). Mean S osm in females was significantly lower than in men ( P = 0.04), but no significant differences were found between sexes for USG ( P = 0.09). When assessed for sensitivity, females and males received scores of 78.79% and 83.02%, respectively, whereas the general sensitivity of all subjects was 81.40%. Assessment of specificity revealed that females and males received scores of 19.46% and 28.13%, respectively, whereas the general specificity of all subjects was 20.99%. Conclusion The present study demonstrates a discordance between USG and S osm . Although it lacked specificity in classifying euhydration, USG tended to classify an individual as hypohydrated compared to S osm . Because USG may falsely classify an athlete as hypohydrated, additional measures of hydration status should be taken to avoid overhydration.

Translational Journal of the American College of Sports MedicineVol. 10(1)
Queens College, CUNY (US), Lebanon Valley College (US), University of South Carolina (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.