Ubiquitous but heterogeneous: International organizations’ influence on public opinion in China, Brazil, Japan, and Sweden

Abstract Existing work on the effect of international organizations’ (IOs) approval of the use of force on public support for it tends to focus on the established great powers in the Global North and its positive main effect. In this research note, we contribute to this literature in two ways with a survey experiment conducted in four countries: Brazil, China, Japan, and Sweden. First, we examine the generalizability of existing findings to relatively understudied countries that include aspiring great powers in the Global South. Second, we examine the heterogeneity of the effect of IOs’ authorization of the use of force. We confirm the generalizability of the positive effect of IOs’ approval on public support for war. At the same time, we find that individuals’ positive responses to IOs’ endorsement are heterogeneous and vary by their beliefs in militant internationalism and educational attainment, and by their home country.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Published
2024-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcae018
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ubiquitous but heterogeneous: International organizations’ influence on public opinion in China, Brazil, Japan, and Sweden

Clara H. Suong, Scott Desposato, Erik Gartzke
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Social Media and Politics
article

Ubiquitous but heterogeneous: International organizations’ influence on public opinion in China, Brazil, Japan, and Sweden

Clara H. Suong, Scott Desposato, Erik Gartzke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Existing work on the effect of international organizations’ (IOs) approval of the use of force on public support for it tends to focus on the established great powers in the Global North and its positive main effect. In this research note, we contribute to this literature in two ways with a survey experiment conducted in four countries: Brazil, China, Japan, and Sweden. First, we examine the generalizability of existing findings to relatively understudied countries that include aspiring great powers in the Global South. Second, we examine the heterogeneity of the effect of IOs’ authorization of the use of force. We confirm the generalizability of the positive effect of IOs’ approval on public support for war. At the same time, we find that individuals’ positive responses to IOs’ endorsement are heterogeneous and vary by their beliefs in militant internationalism and educational attainment, and by their home country.

International Relations of the Asia-PacificVol. 25(2)
University of California San Diego (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Army Research Office
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.