Increasing the utility of epidemiologic studies as key evidence in chemical risk assessment

The Society of Toxicology 2024 meeting assembled risk assessors, epidemiologists, and toxicologists to discuss the utility of integrating epidemiologic data into the derivation of reference values. Advantages of the use of epidemiologic evidence include (i) human relevance; (ii) increased likelihood that exposure levels are relevant to risk assessment; and (iii) incorporation of uncertainties attributed to co-exposures or other population-based considerations. The workshop panelists discussed the challenges of incorporating epidemiologic evidence due to uncertain exposure measurements, confounding, heterogeneity, and inherent study design limitations. Capturing uncertainty is a critical step. In summary, epidemiologic evidence can be a valuable tool for risk analysis. This workshop brief captures constructive considerations from practitioners in the field that can increase the utility of epidemiologic studies in chemical risk assessment and harmonize the approach for use in dose-response assessment that will ultimately reduce uncertainty related to chemical exposures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae134
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increasing the utility of epidemiologic studies as key evidence in chemical risk assessment

Sabine S. Lange, Melissa Vincent, Heather R. Schaefer, Carol J. Burns
2 citations
Toxicological Sciences
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
0.57
article

Increasing the utility of epidemiologic studies as key evidence in chemical risk assessment

Sabine S. Lange, Melissa Vincent, Heather R. Schaefer, Carol J. Burns
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Society of Toxicology 2024 meeting assembled risk assessors, epidemiologists, and toxicologists to discuss the utility of integrating epidemiologic data into the derivation of reference values. Advantages of the use of epidemiologic evidence include (i) human relevance; (ii) increased likelihood that exposure levels are relevant to risk assessment; and (iii) incorporation of uncertainties attributed to co-exposures or other population-based considerations. The workshop panelists discussed the challenges of incorporating epidemiologic evidence due to uncertain exposure measurements, confounding, heterogeneity, and inherent study design limitations. Capturing uncertainty is a critical step. In summary, epidemiologic evidence can be a valuable tool for risk analysis. This workshop brief captures constructive considerations from practitioners in the field that can increase the utility of epidemiologic studies in chemical risk assessment and harmonize the approach for use in dose-response assessment that will ultimately reduce uncertainty related to chemical exposures.

Toxicological SciencesVol. 203(2)
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (US), United States Food and Drug Administration (US), BioStrategies (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.