Predicting control of cardiovascular disease risk factors in South Asia using machine learning

A substantial share of patients at risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) fail to achieve control of CVD risk factors, but clinicians lack a structured approach to identify these patients. We applied machine learning to longitudinal data from two completed randomized controlled trials among 1502 individuals with diabetes in urban India and Pakistan. Using commonly available clinical data, we predict each individual's risk of failing to achieve CVD risk factor control goals or meaningful improvements in risk factors at one year after baseline. When classifying those in the top quartile of predicted risk scores as at risk of failing to achieve goals or meaningful improvements, the precision for not achieving goals was 73% for HbA1c, 30% for SBP, and 24% for LDL, and for not achieving meaningful improvements 88% for HbA1c, 87% for SBP, and 85% for LDL. Such models could be integrated into routine care and enable efficient and targeted delivery of health resources in resource-constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01353-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting control of cardiovascular disease risk factors in South Asia using machine learning

Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikkil Sudharsanan, Nikhil Tandon, Lydia Chwastiak et al.
1 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
0.36
article

Predicting control of cardiovascular disease risk factors in South Asia using machine learning

Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikkil Sudharsanan, Nikhil Tandon, Lydia Chwastiak, Viswanathan Mohan, Anna Reuter, Mohammed K. Ali, Kavita Singh, KM Venkat Narayan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A substantial share of patients at risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) fail to achieve control of CVD risk factors, but clinicians lack a structured approach to identify these patients. We applied machine learning to longitudinal data from two completed randomized controlled trials among 1502 individuals with diabetes in urban India and Pakistan. Using commonly available clinical data, we predict each individual's risk of failing to achieve CVD risk factor control goals or meaningful improvements in risk factors at one year after baseline. When classifying those in the top quartile of predicted risk scores as at risk of failing to achieve goals or meaningful improvements, the precision for not achieving goals was 73% for HbA1c, 30% for SBP, and 24% for LDL, and for not achieving meaningful improvements 88% for HbA1c, 87% for SBP, and 85% for LDL. Such models could be integrated into routine care and enable efficient and targeted delivery of health resources in resource-constrained settings.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
Emory University (US), University of Washington (US), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (IN), Woodruff Health Sciences Center (US), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Munich Security Conference (DE), Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre (IN), Federal Institute for Population Research (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Vanderbilt University, Emory University, UnitedHealth Group, Public Health Foundation of India, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Mental Health, Fogarty International Center, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.