The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru

Cacao production takes place in diverse environments and agricultural systems, with its performance and income generation potential depending on multiple contextual factors. The crop has been promoted among smallholders in South America as a driver for sustainable rural development, but a systematic comparison of the economic performance of diverse cacao production systems in this region was missing, which led to a lack of consistency and clarity on the conditions that enable the crops' success in terms of profitability and income generation for farmers. We aimed to understand the economic performance of different cacao production systems from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú, and the factors that affect their profitability and income generation potential with regards to poverty and living income benchmarks under varying contexts. We employed the ‘typical farm approach’ to perform a comparative analysis of fifteen different cacao production systems from six distinct agroecological regions from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú. Eight out of the fifteen systems analyzed were found to be economically viable, while the remaining systems generate considerable losses. Positive outcomes depend on a combination of factors including sufficient prices, yields and land availability, adequate labor allocation, timely diversification, subsidies and low costs of productive factors. Considering those factors, we identified minimum conditions for achieving profitability and living incomes. Our findings provide essential information to decision makers on the limitations of cacao productive systems for achieving a living income, as well as the type of diversification, minimum prices, area and yields that could enhance their economic sustainability. Based on our findings, we discuss the relevance of subsidies for improving the system's performance. Finally, we suggest the use of different indicators and standardized assumptions to allow more reliable comparisons between cacao production systems. • We compare the financial performance of fifteen cacao production systems from three South American countries. • Using consistent parameters and assumptions, we evaluate which factors are more relevant for farm's economic success. • Different systems can generate a living income, but a combination of various favorable conditions is required. • High prices, high yields, diversification and minimum farm size are critical for generating a living income

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Systems
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104235
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru

Miguel Romero, Andrés Charry, Mirjam Pulleman, Guillermo Zambrano et al.
15 citations
Agricultural Systems
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
12.97
article

The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru

Miguel Romero, Andrés Charry, Mirjam Pulleman, Guillermo Zambrano, Marcela Quintero, Mark Lundy, Karen Ramírez, Fredy Yovera, Carolay Perea, Tito Jiménez, Adriana O. Santos
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Cacao production takes place in diverse environments and agricultural systems, with its performance and income generation potential depending on multiple contextual factors. The crop has been promoted among smallholders in South America as a driver for sustainable rural development, but a systematic comparison of the economic performance of diverse cacao production systems in this region was missing, which led to a lack of consistency and clarity on the conditions that enable the crops' success in terms of profitability and income generation for farmers. We aimed to understand the economic performance of different cacao production systems from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú, and the factors that affect their profitability and income generation potential with regards to poverty and living income benchmarks under varying contexts. We employed the ‘typical farm approach’ to perform a comparative analysis of fifteen different cacao production systems from six distinct agroecological regions from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú. Eight out of the fifteen systems analyzed were found to be economically viable, while the remaining systems generate considerable losses. Positive outcomes depend on a combination of factors including sufficient prices, yields and land availability, adequate labor allocation, timely diversification, subsidies and low costs of productive factors. Considering those factors, we identified minimum conditions for achieving profitability and living incomes. Our findings provide essential information to decision makers on the limitations of cacao productive systems for achieving a living income, as well as the type of diversification, minimum prices, area and yields that could enhance their economic sustainability. Based on our findings, we discuss the relevance of subsidies for improving the system's performance. Finally, we suggest the use of different indicators and standardized assumptions to allow more reliable comparisons between cacao production systems. • We compare the financial performance of fifteen cacao production systems from three South American countries. • Using consistent parameters and assumptions, we evaluate which factors are more relevant for farm's economic success. • Different systems can generate a living income, but a combination of various favorable conditions is required. • High prices, high yields, diversification and minimum farm size are critical for generating a living income

Agricultural SystemsVol. 224
International Potato Center (PE), Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CO), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
12.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.