Bike network planning in limited urban space

The lack of cycling infrastructure in urban environments hinders the adoption of cycling as a viable mode for commuting, despite the evident benefits of (e-)bikes as sustainable, efficient, and health-promoting transportation modes. Bike network planning is a tedious process, relying on heuristic computational methods that frequently overlook the broader implications of introducing new cycling infrastructure, in particular the necessity to repurpose car lanes. In this work, we call for optimizing the trade-off between bike and car networks, effectively pushing for Pareto optimality. This shift in perspective gives rise to a novel linear programming formulation towards optimal bike network allocation. Our experiments, conducted using both real-world and synthetic data, testify the effectiveness and superiority of this optimization approach compared to heuristic methods. In particular, the framework provides stakeholders with a range of lane reallocation scenarios, illustrating potential bike network enhancements and their implications for car infrastructure. Crucially, our approach is adaptable to various bikeability and car accessibility evaluation criteria, making our tool a highly flexible and scalable resource for urban planning. This paper presents an advanced decision-support framework that can significantly aid urban planners in making informed decisions on cycling infrastructure development. • Developing a novel linear programming approach towards optimal bike network planning. • Evaluating the trade-off between bike and car travel times with Pareto frontiers. • Demonstrating the utility and scalability of the approach on real and synthetic data. • A case study on Zurich supports the applicability as a decision support system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part B Methodological
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103135
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bike network planning in limited urban space

Martin Raubal, Henry Martin, Christian Nöbel, Nina Wiedemann et al.
12 citations
Transportation Research Part B Methodological
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.20
article

Bike network planning in limited urban space

Martin Raubal, Henry Martin, Christian Nöbel, Nina Wiedemann, Lukas Ballo
article en
12 citations

Abstract

The lack of cycling infrastructure in urban environments hinders the adoption of cycling as a viable mode for commuting, despite the evident benefits of (e-)bikes as sustainable, efficient, and health-promoting transportation modes. Bike network planning is a tedious process, relying on heuristic computational methods that frequently overlook the broader implications of introducing new cycling infrastructure, in particular the necessity to repurpose car lanes. In this work, we call for optimizing the trade-off between bike and car networks, effectively pushing for Pareto optimality. This shift in perspective gives rise to a novel linear programming formulation towards optimal bike network allocation. Our experiments, conducted using both real-world and synthetic data, testify the effectiveness and superiority of this optimization approach compared to heuristic methods. In particular, the framework provides stakeholders with a range of lane reallocation scenarios, illustrating potential bike network enhancements and their implications for car infrastructure. Crucially, our approach is adaptable to various bikeability and car accessibility evaluation criteria, making our tool a highly flexible and scalable resource for urban planning. This paper presents an advanced decision-support framework that can significantly aid urban planners in making informed decisions on cycling infrastructure development. • Developing a novel linear programming approach towards optimal bike network planning. • Evaluating the trade-off between bike and car travel times with Pareto frontiers. • Demonstrating the utility and scalability of the approach on real and synthetic data. • A case study on Zurich supports the applicability as a decision support system.

Transportation Research Part B MethodologicalVol. 192
ETH Zurich (CH)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.