(152) LISTENER SATISFACTION AND UTILITY OF UROLOGIC PODCASTS: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF PATIENTS AND PROVIDERS

Abstract Introduction Despite the multitude of urology podcasts developed for both patients and providers, there is little research on the use of urology podcasts and the effects of these podcasts on listeners and their behaviors. Objective We sought to identify listener interests and satisfaction with urology podcasts and determine whether the podcasts influences the listeners’ behaviors or health-related decisions. Methods Qualtrics surveys were distributed to both patients and providers who listen to urology podcasts via social media. Survey information assessed self-reported demographics and podcast listening habits. Participants selected specific urology podcast(s) and answered questions about satisfaction with the selected podcasts and how the podcast influenced their behaviors. A subset of questions were administered to providers about the podcast appropriateness for their level of training and whether the podcast influenced their practice. Results There were 212 survey participants. Demographics and podcast listening habits are listed in Table 1. Of the participants, 81.13% agreed or strongly agreed that the podcast(s) improved their knowledge of topics covered and 82.08% agreed or strongly agreed that the podcast(s) were clear and easy to understand. 85.19% were likely or extremely likely to recommend the podcast(s) to a friend. After listening to the podcast(s), 84.66% reported changing their behavior (i.e., went to the doctor, changed their practice). The most valuable aspects of the podcasts were the ability to review materials at their own pace (33.33%) and at any time (24.56%). The preferred lengths for podcasts were 15-30 minutes (35.47%) and 30-45 minutes (30.23%). Once weekly was the ideal frequency of new episodes (51.18%) while solo lecture-style was the preferred format (40.35%). Half of the healthcare providers were attendings, 17.39% were fellows, 10.87% were residents, 13.04% were students, 6.52% were advanced practice providers, and 2.17% were physical therapists. 91.84% agreed or strongly agreed that the podcasts were appropriate for their training. After listening to the podcast(s) 81.63% changed or planned to change their practice. Conclusions Urology podcasts are effective forms of education for patients and providers. Majority of listeners would recommend the podcast(s) to a friend and endorsed changing their behavior after listening to the podcast(s). Disclosure No.