(252) INDUCING BUSINESS OR IMPROVING PRACTICE? AN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING STEM CELL TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR PHYSICIANS

Abstract Introduction Most US businesses offering unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) are run by physicians, many of whom operate outside their scope of training. To date, little effort has been made to educate practicing physicians about SCIs. To circumvent the need, several businesses have begun advertising training opportunities for physicians. Objective To understand the current training landscape for physicians, we undertook a systematic content analysis of stem cell courses advertised on the internet. Methods We conducted Google searches using keywords and included onsite, online, and hybrid training programs targeting physicians or other clinicians. We systematically examined all information and identified 14 courses (6 onsite, 4 online, and 4 hybrid) offered by 11 different organizations. Courses ranged from single-day workshops to year-long programs with an average cost of $4,919 and ranged from $500 to $22,000. Results Nine courses listed a practicum component and ten courses listed 63 affiliated clinics, companies, and non-profit institutions. Eight organizations included learner testimonials as text and/or video with most authored by physicians and all expressed a positive tone. We analyzed marketing language used by training organizations that 6 of 14 explicitly mentioned offering assistance in marketing and/or revenue growth to learners. We also examined the backgrounds of physician faculty among organizations. Of the 7 businesses which listed faculty, a total of 172 faculty were found ranging from 4 to 71 individuals. Among the 172 faculty, 121 were physicians where we were able to determine whether they provided unproven, questionable or proven treatments within their practice. The majority of physician faculty (66%) were associated with unproven treatments, 21% offered proven treatments, and 13% offered questionable treatments. Nearly half the faculty (48%) provided 3-5 unproven therapies, 35% provided 1-2 unproven therapies, and 17% provided 6 or more unproven therapies. Conclusions Our results indicate that current pedagogical offerings for physicians interested in SCIs are likely to offer questionable training that is not rooted in evidence. Physicians interested in SCIs should seek training from nationally accredited organizations. The scientific community should invest in physician training surrounding SCIs. Disclosure No.