Ethnographic Experimentation and the Disappearing Field of Ethnography

Experimentation is becoming increasingly common in anthropology as a growing number of anthropologists have engaged in a range of experimental practices in the activities of analysis, theorisation and fieldwork. Although this experimental drive is neither generalisable nor representative, it points to a significant effort to reorient the empirical modes of anthropological inquiry. Ethnographic experimentation in fieldwork is especially relevant because, in contrast to the naturalistic tradition, it involves an interventionist practice dedicated to devising conditions for the ethnographic encounter. Displacing the centrality of observational activities, I argue that ethnographic experiments involve an epistemological transformation, since the locus of knowledge production is not the anthropologist’s unmediated experience in the field, but rather the experimental devices through which ethnography takes place. In this process, the field loses its relevance in the conceptualisation of ethnography, and the experimental arrangement – what I call field devices – becomes the organisational principle of the ethnographic encounter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnos
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2024.2438004
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnographic Experimentation and the Disappearing Field of Ethnography

Adolfo Estalella
Ethnos
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Ethnographic Experimentation and the Disappearing Field of Ethnography

Adolfo Estalella
article en

Abstract

Experimentation is becoming increasingly common in anthropology as a growing number of anthropologists have engaged in a range of experimental practices in the activities of analysis, theorisation and fieldwork. Although this experimental drive is neither generalisable nor representative, it points to a significant effort to reorient the empirical modes of anthropological inquiry. Ethnographic experimentation in fieldwork is especially relevant because, in contrast to the naturalistic tradition, it involves an interventionist practice dedicated to devising conditions for the ethnographic encounter. Displacing the centrality of observational activities, I argue that ethnographic experiments involve an epistemological transformation, since the locus of knowledge production is not the anthropologist’s unmediated experience in the field, but rather the experimental devices through which ethnography takes place. In this process, the field loses its relevance in the conceptualisation of ethnography, and the experimental arrangement – what I call field devices – becomes the organisational principle of the ethnographic encounter.

EthnosVol. 91(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.