How fake news effects spread in an oligopolistic market — Evidence from the insulin market

• On 11 November 2022, a fake Twitter account declared that insulin would be free. • The paper focuses on spillovers to competitors using an event study approach. • Competitors experienced smaller and shorter negative effects than the targeted firm. • The pharmaceutical sector experienced shorter spillovers than insulin manufacturers. • No anticipation effects and no spread outside the American market were observed. This study analyzes the impact of an event on November 11, 2022, when a fake “certified” Twitter account falsely claimed that Eli Lilly's insulin would be provided for free. We examine spillover effects on competitors within the insulin market oligopoly. Our findings reveal that while competitors experienced short-term impacts, these were weaker and of shorter duration compared to Eli Lilly. Spillovers within the broader pharmaceutical sector were limited to the immediate aftermath. No anticipatory behavior was detected. The effects were confined to American stock exchanges, suggesting an absence of spillovers in European markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106644
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How fake news effects spread in an oligopolistic market — Evidence from the insulin market

Aniss Louchez
2 citations
Finance research letters
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
article

How fake news effects spread in an oligopolistic market — Evidence from the insulin market

Aniss Louchez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• On 11 November 2022, a fake Twitter account declared that insulin would be free. • The paper focuses on spillovers to competitors using an event study approach. • Competitors experienced smaller and shorter negative effects than the targeted firm. • The pharmaceutical sector experienced shorter spillovers than insulin manufacturers. • No anticipation effects and no spread outside the American market were observed. This study analyzes the impact of an event on November 11, 2022, when a fake “certified” Twitter account falsely claimed that Eli Lilly's insulin would be provided for free. We examine spillover effects on competitors within the insulin market oligopoly. Our findings reveal that while competitors experienced short-term impacts, these were weaker and of shorter duration compared to Eli Lilly. Spillovers within the broader pharmaceutical sector were limited to the immediate aftermath. No anticipatory behavior was detected. The effects were confined to American stock exchanges, suggesting an absence of spillovers in European markets.

Finance research lettersVol. 73
Computer Science Laboratory of Lille (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How fake news effects spread in an oligopolistic market — Evidence from the insulin market — Aniss Louchez · Finance research letters (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS