A human working memory advantage for social network information

As a social species, humans live in complexly bounded social groups. In order to navigate these networks, humans rely on a set of social-cognitive processes, including social working memory. Here, we designed a novel network memory task to study working memory for social versus non-social network information across 241 participants (18-65 years) in a tightly controlled, preregistered study. We show that humans demonstrate a working memory advantage for social, relative to non-social, network information. We also observed a self-relevant positivity bias, but an 'other' negativity bias. These findings are interpreted in the context of an evolutionary need to belong to one's social group, to identify risks to one's social safety and to appropriately track one's social status within a complex network of social relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.1930
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A human working memory advantage for social network information

Jack L. Andrews, Susanne Schweizer, Karina Grunewald
1 citations
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
0.34
article

A human working memory advantage for social network information

Jack L. Andrews, Susanne Schweizer, Karina Grunewald
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As a social species, humans live in complexly bounded social groups. In order to navigate these networks, humans rely on a set of social-cognitive processes, including social working memory. Here, we designed a novel network memory task to study working memory for social versus non-social network information across 241 participants (18-65 years) in a tightly controlled, preregistered study. We show that humans demonstrate a working memory advantage for social, relative to non-social, network information. We also observed a self-relevant positivity bias, but an 'other' negativity bias. These findings are interpreted in the context of an evolutionary need to belong to one's social group, to identify risks to one's social safety and to appropriately track one's social status within a complex network of social relationships.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 291(2036)
University of Cambridge (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Oxford (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.