Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring teaching faculties motivation from medical and medical allied universities in Myanmar

Background: Motivation status of teaching faculties in medical field can influence the students’ academic achievement, therefore, developing the tools to measure of it is essential. The study was conducted to develop and validate the questionnaire that can assess the motivation status of teaching faculties from medical and allied universities. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods study was used. The qualitative part developed a questionnaire by two rounds of Delphi expert panels. The quantitative part validated the questionnaire using both exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Purposive sampling method was used for Delphi and total (661) participants for quantitative portion was selected randomly from medical and allied universities. First, 78-item questionnaire was generated based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory model. Two expert panels ensured the questionnaire’s content validity and finally, developed a 68-item questionnaire. Factor analysis was conducted to validate the questionnaire with separate samples for EFA (n=331) and CFA (n=330). Results: EFA supported the four factors structure with 35 high loading items and which extracted 54% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and reliability values received (more than 0.7) for all constructs. The CFA further confirmed the construct, convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire measuring motivation status with RMSEA=0.059, CFI=0.924, TLI=0.914, SRMR=0.057. Conclusions: The final question set consisted of 35 items; communication (11 items), support (11 items), self-actualizations (9 items) and basic needs (4 items) which was shown to be a reliable and valid tool to be measure the motivation status among teaching faculties from medical and allied universities in Myanmar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20243768
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring teaching faculties motivation from medical and medical allied universities in Myanmar

Cynthia Maung, Tin Lay Wai, Swe Mar Myint Lwin
1 links
International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring teaching faculties motivation from medical and medical allied universities in Myanmar

Cynthia Maung, Tin Lay Wai, Swe Mar Myint Lwin
article en

Abstract

Background: Motivation status of teaching faculties in medical field can influence the students’ academic achievement, therefore, developing the tools to measure of it is essential. The study was conducted to develop and validate the questionnaire that can assess the motivation status of teaching faculties from medical and allied universities. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods study was used. The qualitative part developed a questionnaire by two rounds of Delphi expert panels. The quantitative part validated the questionnaire using both exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Purposive sampling method was used for Delphi and total (661) participants for quantitative portion was selected randomly from medical and allied universities. First, 78-item questionnaire was generated based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory model. Two expert panels ensured the questionnaire’s content validity and finally, developed a 68-item questionnaire. Factor analysis was conducted to validate the questionnaire with separate samples for EFA (n=331) and CFA (n=330). Results: EFA supported the four factors structure with 35 high loading items and which extracted 54% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and reliability values received (more than 0.7) for all constructs. The CFA further confirmed the construct, convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire measuring motivation status with RMSEA=0.059, CFI=0.924, TLI=0.914, SRMR=0.057. Conclusions: The final question set consisted of 35 items; communication (11 items), support (11 items), self-actualizations (9 items) and basic needs (4 items) which was shown to be a reliable and valid tool to be measure the motivation status among teaching faculties from medical and allied universities in Myanmar.

International Journal of Community Medicine and Public HealthVol. 12(1)
Ministry of Health and Sports (MM), University of Public Health Yangon (MM)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring teaching faculties motivation from medical and medical allied universities in Myanmar — Cynthia Maung, Tin Lay Wai, et al. · International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS