Glow Discharge Boronization and Real-Time Boronization Using an Impurity Powder Dropper in LHD

• Boron non-uniformly distributes on the wall but reduces impurities and contributes to plasma operation. • Real-time boronization during long pulse discharges longer than 200 s is investigated. • The lifetime of the boron effect on Fe (first wall material) is much shorter than that on O. In the Large Helical Device (LHD), boronization is utilized for wall conditioning, employing two distinct methods: glow discharge using diborane gas and the injection of boron powder into the plasma via an impurity powder dropper (IPD). Glow discharge boronization is conducted after maintenance when the vacuum vessel is exposed to air and just before the start of an experimental campaign. In contrast, real-time boronization using the IPD is performed during discharges. The distribution of boron on plasma-facing components was assessed through long-term material probes in the case of glow discharge and through numerical simulations for the IPD method. Results indicated non-uniform boron distributions in both cases. The impact of these boronization techniques on impurity levels and the lifetime of their effects were also examined. Both methods effectively reduced oxygen and iron in the plasma, with the iron impurities originating from the first wall. For glow discharge boronization, the reduction in oxygen levels persisted until the end of the experimental campaign, whereas the reduction in iron levels only lasted a few days. In the case of boron injection during long pulse discharges exceeding 200 s, the suppression of oxygen and iron was observed. The effect on iron quickly diminished within several seconds after the injection ended, whereas the effect on oxygen lasted more than 100 s. The difference in the lifetimes of the boronization effects is further discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2024.101843
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glow Discharge Boronization and Real-Time Boronization Using an Impurity Powder Dropper in LHD

T. Oishi, R. Lunsford, M. Goto, S. Masuzaki et al.
6 citations
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
0.70
article

Glow Discharge Boronization and Real-Time Boronization Using an Impurity Powder Dropper in LHD

T. Oishi, R. Lunsford, M. Goto, S. Masuzaki, M Yajima, M. Shoji, F. Nespoli, N. Pablant, E.P. Gilson, Tomoko Kawate, Y Yoshimura, Hiroshi Kasahara, M. Tokitani, T. Morisaki, G. Motojima
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Boron non-uniformly distributes on the wall but reduces impurities and contributes to plasma operation. • Real-time boronization during long pulse discharges longer than 200 s is investigated. • The lifetime of the boron effect on Fe (first wall material) is much shorter than that on O. In the Large Helical Device (LHD), boronization is utilized for wall conditioning, employing two distinct methods: glow discharge using diborane gas and the injection of boron powder into the plasma via an impurity powder dropper (IPD). Glow discharge boronization is conducted after maintenance when the vacuum vessel is exposed to air and just before the start of an experimental campaign. In contrast, real-time boronization using the IPD is performed during discharges. The distribution of boron on plasma-facing components was assessed through long-term material probes in the case of glow discharge and through numerical simulations for the IPD method. Results indicated non-uniform boron distributions in both cases. The impact of these boronization techniques on impurity levels and the lifetime of their effects were also examined. Both methods effectively reduced oxygen and iron in the plasma, with the iron impurities originating from the first wall. For glow discharge boronization, the reduction in oxygen levels persisted until the end of the experimental campaign, whereas the reduction in iron levels only lasted a few days. In the case of boron injection during long pulse discharges exceeding 200 s, the suppression of oxygen and iron was observed. The effect on iron quickly diminished within several seconds after the injection ended, whereas the effect on oxygen lasted more than 100 s. The difference in the lifetimes of the boronization effects is further discussed.

Nuclear Materials and EnergyVol. 42
National Institutes of Natural Sciences (JP), The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (US), National Institute for Fusion Science (JP), National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP)
U.S. Department of Energy, Princeton University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, National Institute for Fusion Science
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.