Kewarganegaraan dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Minoritas

This study compares national and Islamic law on citizenship and legal protection for minority groups. Citizenship determines the basic rights of individuals, while minority groups often face discrimination in national and Islamic legal systems. This research explores the protection of minorities in international human rights-based national law and Islamic law through the concept of ahl al-dhimma. Case studies from India, France, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia show a variety of approaches, such as the controversial CAA in India, the laïcité principle in France, and conservative and progressive interpretations of Islamic law in Saudi Arabia and Tunisia. The results highlight the challenges of implementing equal protection in both legal systems due to political and social dynamics. In conclusion, inclusive policies based on interfaith and cross-cultural dialogue are needed to strengthen minority rights globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aliansi
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i1.626
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kewarganegaraan dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Minoritas

Ashfiya Nur Atqiya, Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha, Fadli Muhsin Setiawan, Lailatun Hasna et al.
Aliansi
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Kewarganegaraan dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Minoritas

Ashfiya Nur Atqiya, Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha, Fadli Muhsin Setiawan, Lailatun Hasna, Nanda Nurmayanti
article en

Abstract

This study compares national and Islamic law on citizenship and legal protection for minority groups. Citizenship determines the basic rights of individuals, while minority groups often face discrimination in national and Islamic legal systems. This research explores the protection of minorities in international human rights-based national law and Islamic law through the concept of ahl al-dhimma. Case studies from India, France, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia show a variety of approaches, such as the controversial CAA in India, the laïcité principle in France, and conservative and progressive interpretations of Islamic law in Saudi Arabia and Tunisia. The results highlight the challenges of implementing equal protection in both legal systems due to political and social dynamics. In conclusion, inclusive policies based on interfaith and cross-cultural dialogue are needed to strengthen minority rights globally.

AliansiVol. 2(1)
Sebelas Maret University (ID), UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.