Moving forward – staying put: Social science postgraduates’ Covid-19 (im)mobilities

When the Covid-19 pandemic began, social science postgraduates (PGRs) in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland were instantaneously prevented from undertaking their carefully planned in-person fieldwork. The pandemic disrupted many PGRs’ temporalities, often resulting in both academic and existential immobility. During Covid-19, PGRs reacted in varying ways to the tensions of wanting to move forward with their PhD toward their future selves, yet often experienced staying put. This article explores the influences on several PGRs’ attempts to (re)gain control over their temporal (im)mobilities. It also analyses the impact of PGRs’ social and academic (im)mobilities resulting from Covid-19 on their (un)well-being. The research reflected on how Covid often interrupted PGRs’ hoped-for futures as their spatial immobilities became bound up with (im)mobilities related to their PhD. The article also directs attention to how ethnographic apprenticeship must encompass strategies to prepare PGRs for their PhD work as an aspect of their future-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critique of Anthropology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x241302701
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving forward – staying put: Social science postgraduates’ Covid-19 (im)mobilities

Tom Marshall
Critique of Anthropology
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Moving forward – staying put: Social science postgraduates’ Covid-19 (im)mobilities

Tom Marshall
article en

Abstract

When the Covid-19 pandemic began, social science postgraduates (PGRs) in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland were instantaneously prevented from undertaking their carefully planned in-person fieldwork. The pandemic disrupted many PGRs’ temporalities, often resulting in both academic and existential immobility. During Covid-19, PGRs reacted in varying ways to the tensions of wanting to move forward with their PhD toward their future selves, yet often experienced staying put. This article explores the influences on several PGRs’ attempts to (re)gain control over their temporal (im)mobilities. It also analyses the impact of PGRs’ social and academic (im)mobilities resulting from Covid-19 on their (un)well-being. The research reflected on how Covid often interrupted PGRs’ hoped-for futures as their spatial immobilities became bound up with (im)mobilities related to their PhD. The article also directs attention to how ethnographic apprenticeship must encompass strategies to prepare PGRs for their PhD work as an aspect of their future-making.

Critique of AnthropologyVol. 44(4)
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Department for the Economy
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.