Lifeline Ferries: Existential dimensions of ‘essential’ mobility

Grounded in an analysis of islanders’ ferry mobility between the Isle of Coll and mainland Scotland during the Covid-19 pandemic, this article argues for increased anthropological engagement with the existential dimension of mechanised mobilities. The pandemic restrictions on mobility rested upon the distinction between socio-economically framed ‘essential’ and existentially framed ‘non-essential travel’. However, islanders’ agentive navigation of restrictions gave rise to a locally specific regime of im/mobility that emphasised the existential dimension of those mobilities that policymakers understood as a ‘lifeline’ in a socio-economic sense. To show this, the article applies the concept of existential mobility, developed by Hage, to mechanised mobilities, which remain understudied in anthropology. It argues that thus attending to their existential dimension is crucial to overcome a remaining sedentarist bias in anthropological thinking on mobility, and to avoid unintentionally reproducing governing categories like ‘essential’ and ‘non-essential’ in our analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critique of Anthropology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x241299354
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lifeline Ferries: Existential dimensions of ‘essential’ mobility

Christina Bosbach
Critique of Anthropology
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Lifeline Ferries: Existential dimensions of ‘essential’ mobility

Christina Bosbach
article en

Abstract

Grounded in an analysis of islanders’ ferry mobility between the Isle of Coll and mainland Scotland during the Covid-19 pandemic, this article argues for increased anthropological engagement with the existential dimension of mechanised mobilities. The pandemic restrictions on mobility rested upon the distinction between socio-economically framed ‘essential’ and existentially framed ‘non-essential travel’. However, islanders’ agentive navigation of restrictions gave rise to a locally specific regime of im/mobility that emphasised the existential dimension of those mobilities that policymakers understood as a ‘lifeline’ in a socio-economic sense. To show this, the article applies the concept of existential mobility, developed by Hage, to mechanised mobilities, which remain understudied in anthropology. It argues that thus attending to their existential dimension is crucial to overcome a remaining sedentarist bias in anthropological thinking on mobility, and to avoid unintentionally reproducing governing categories like ‘essential’ and ‘non-essential’ in our analyses.

Critique of AnthropologyVol. 44(4)
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.