The Contributions of Attentional Bias and Expectancy Bias to Fluctuations in State Anxiety

Abstract Background Individuals differ in the degree to which they experience elevations in state anxiety in response to anticipated potentially stressful events, which may be explained by variance in the way information relevant to those stressors is processed. The present study aimed to test the validity of the hypothesis that the attentional processing of negative event-related information will be positively associated with changes in event-related negative expectancy bias, which in turn will be positively associated with elevations in state anxiety. Method Using a variant of the dual probe task, participants were asked to report their state anxiety and negative expectancy bias at multiple points and were presented with information relevant to a specific anticipated potentially stressful event from which a measure of attentional bias was obtained. Results The results indicated a case of complete mediation, whereby changes in event-related negative expectancy bias fully mediated the relationship between attentional bias to negative event-related information and elevations in state anxiety. Conclusions This finding adds to our understanding of how the biased processing of information can explain fluctuations in state anxiety and invites research into alternative presentations of biased information processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10535-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Contributions of Attentional Bias and Expectancy Bias to Fluctuations in State Anxiety

James Tough, Bram Van Bockstaele, Colin MacLeod, Ben Grafton
2 citations
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
1.02
article

The Contributions of Attentional Bias and Expectancy Bias to Fluctuations in State Anxiety

James Tough, Bram Van Bockstaele, Colin MacLeod, Ben Grafton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Individuals differ in the degree to which they experience elevations in state anxiety in response to anticipated potentially stressful events, which may be explained by variance in the way information relevant to those stressors is processed. The present study aimed to test the validity of the hypothesis that the attentional processing of negative event-related information will be positively associated with changes in event-related negative expectancy bias, which in turn will be positively associated with elevations in state anxiety. Method Using a variant of the dual probe task, participants were asked to report their state anxiety and negative expectancy bias at multiple points and were presented with information relevant to a specific anticipated potentially stressful event from which a measure of attentional bias was obtained. Results The results indicated a case of complete mediation, whereby changes in event-related negative expectancy bias fully mediated the relationship between attentional bias to negative event-related information and elevations in state anxiety. Conclusions This finding adds to our understanding of how the biased processing of information can explain fluctuations in state anxiety and invites research into alternative presentations of biased information processing.

Cognitive Therapy and ResearchVol. 49(1)
The University of Western Australia (AU), Ghent University (BE)
University of Western Australia, Australian Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.