Statistical analysis of process parameters for additive manufacturing of a pipe spacer for oil and gas applications

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effects of process parameters on parts produced through the material extrusion process to create a piping spacer suitable for oil and gas applications. Design/methodology/approach The two primary materials examined were Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate (ASA) and High-Impact Polystyrene (HIPS). Taguchi’s design of experiment methodology was used for the design of experiments. The effect of processing parameters fill density, layer thickness and printing orientation) on the output factors (maximum compressive strength and specific energy) was analyzed through analysis of variance. According to the application of the piping spacer, compression testing is deemed to be as per ASTM-D695 requirements. In addition to this, the optimum processing factors were identified through gray relational analysis (GRA) and response surface methodology (RSM). Findings ANOVA results indicate that fill density had the highest percentage contribution for ASA, with a percentage of 29.84%, followed by layer thickness (27.54%) and printing orientation (22.08%). However, for the HIPS material, density was the most influential element, with a contribution of 77.80%, followed by layer thickness at 16.77% and printing orientation at 4.39%. Optimization of the process parameters through GRA and RSM suggested the optimum parameters combination for ASA was 90° printing orientation, 0.09 mm layer thickness and 100% fill density, whereas HIPS had the same response except for the printing orientation, which was 0°, 0.09 mm layer thickness and 100% fill density. Originality/value This paper can serve as an aid in understanding the effect of printing orientation, layer thickness and fill density on the plyometric material extrusion process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-05-2024-0189
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical analysis of process parameters for additive manufacturing of a pipe spacer for oil and gas applications

Mabkhoot Alsaiari, Mushtaq Khan, João Manuel R. S. Tavares, Djavanroodi Faramarz
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Statistical analysis of process parameters for additive manufacturing of a pipe spacer for oil and gas applications

Mabkhoot Alsaiari, Mushtaq Khan, João Manuel R. S. Tavares, Djavanroodi Faramarz
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effects of process parameters on parts produced through the material extrusion process to create a piping spacer suitable for oil and gas applications. Design/methodology/approach The two primary materials examined were Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate (ASA) and High-Impact Polystyrene (HIPS). Taguchi’s design of experiment methodology was used for the design of experiments. The effect of processing parameters fill density, layer thickness and printing orientation) on the output factors (maximum compressive strength and specific energy) was analyzed through analysis of variance. According to the application of the piping spacer, compression testing is deemed to be as per ASTM-D695 requirements. In addition to this, the optimum processing factors were identified through gray relational analysis (GRA) and response surface methodology (RSM). Findings ANOVA results indicate that fill density had the highest percentage contribution for ASA, with a percentage of 29.84%, followed by layer thickness (27.54%) and printing orientation (22.08%). However, for the HIPS material, density was the most influential element, with a contribution of 77.80%, followed by layer thickness at 16.77% and printing orientation at 4.39%. Optimization of the process parameters through GRA and RSM suggested the optimum parameters combination for ASA was 90° printing orientation, 0.09 mm layer thickness and 100% fill density, whereas HIPS had the same response except for the printing orientation, which was 0°, 0.09 mm layer thickness and 100% fill density. Originality/value This paper can serve as an aid in understanding the effect of printing orientation, layer thickness and fill density on the plyometric material extrusion process.

Rapid Prototyping JournalVol. 31(3)
Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University (SA), Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.