Pollination deficits increase with urbanization in Chicago

Abstract Urban growth is occurring rapidly, and the land use changes associated with urbanization may have consequences for pollinators and the plants that rely on them. Despite its importance in the face of pollinator declines and expanding urban ecosystems, our understanding of the effects of urbanization on pollination mutualisms is scant. There is both evidence that urban areas support diverse pollinator communities and evidence that they degrade them. The influence of urbanization on the pollination of urban plants is even less understood. Urban agriculture relies on plant–pollinator interactions for crop production, providing a relevant framework to study pollination in an urban context. We therefore grew 240 plants across six sites at varying levels of urbanization in Chicago, Illinois, to investigate how urbanization relates to pollination of Cucurbita pepo (squash) and the buzz‐pollinated Solanum lycopersicum (tomato). We used a pollen limitation experiment to test whether the reproduction of plants at urban farms is pollen‐limited and whether the magnitude of pollen limitation varies with the extent of urbanization (quantified as the percent of surrounding impervious surface around each site). We also examined how pollinator visitation rates vary with urbanization. In S. lycopersicum but not C. pepo , the pollen addition treatment had a consistent and significant positive effect on reproductive success, indicating that plants of S. lycopersicum are pollen‐limited in our study area. The magnitude of pollen limitation increased with greater impervious surface, illustrating that S. lycopersicum plants at more urban sites are more pollen‐limited. For C. pepo , there was only evidence of pollen limitation at the most urban site, and a weak trend of pollen limitation of fruit set (but not seed set) increasing with impervious surface. Our results demonstrate that urban plants are likely experiencing deficits in pollination services but in ways that vary with both the type of pollination system and the level of urbanization in the surrounding area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosphere
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70100
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pollination deficits increase with urbanization in Chicago

Paul J. CaraDonna, Alexandra Zink, Amy M. Iler, Kelly Larsen
3 citations
Ecosphere
Plant and animal studies
3.09
article

Pollination deficits increase with urbanization in Chicago

Paul J. CaraDonna, Alexandra Zink, Amy M. Iler, Kelly Larsen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Urban growth is occurring rapidly, and the land use changes associated with urbanization may have consequences for pollinators and the plants that rely on them. Despite its importance in the face of pollinator declines and expanding urban ecosystems, our understanding of the effects of urbanization on pollination mutualisms is scant. There is both evidence that urban areas support diverse pollinator communities and evidence that they degrade them. The influence of urbanization on the pollination of urban plants is even less understood. Urban agriculture relies on plant–pollinator interactions for crop production, providing a relevant framework to study pollination in an urban context. We therefore grew 240 plants across six sites at varying levels of urbanization in Chicago, Illinois, to investigate how urbanization relates to pollination of Cucurbita pepo (squash) and the buzz‐pollinated Solanum lycopersicum (tomato). We used a pollen limitation experiment to test whether the reproduction of plants at urban farms is pollen‐limited and whether the magnitude of pollen limitation varies with the extent of urbanization (quantified as the percent of surrounding impervious surface around each site). We also examined how pollinator visitation rates vary with urbanization. In S. lycopersicum but not C. pepo , the pollen addition treatment had a consistent and significant positive effect on reproductive success, indicating that plants of S. lycopersicum are pollen‐limited in our study area. The magnitude of pollen limitation increased with greater impervious surface, illustrating that S. lycopersicum plants at more urban sites are more pollen‐limited. For C. pepo , there was only evidence of pollen limitation at the most urban site, and a weak trend of pollen limitation of fruit set (but not seed set) increasing with impervious surface. Our results demonstrate that urban plants are likely experiencing deficits in pollination services but in ways that vary with both the type of pollination system and the level of urbanization in the surrounding area.

EcosphereVol. 15(12)
Northwestern University (US), Center for Plant Conservation (US), City Harvest (US), Chicago Botanic Garden
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant and animal studies
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.