Assessing the Coping Strategies of Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 in Jaipur, Rajasthan: An Empirical Analysis

This study explores the coping strategies adopted by healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic and their relationship with stress levels. A balanced representation of doctors and nurses participated, with a slightly higher proportion of males (60%) and most respondents aged 25–44, reflecting a workforce likely to experience significant occupational stress. Among coping strategies, problem-focused approaches, such as planning and addressing stressors, were the most commonly utilized (54% occasionally), though only 9% of HCWs employed them daily due to the high-pressure environment. Emotion-focused strategies, including seeking emotional support, were moderately used (39%) and played a key role in stress management, but only 28% used them daily. Avoidant-focused coping strategies, such as denial and self-distraction, emerged as the most frequently employed daily mechanism (30%), offering short-term relief but raising concerns about long-term stress implications. Regression analysis revealed significant relationships between stress levels and coping mechanisms. Avoidant-focused strategies exhibited the strongest association (R² = 0.812), followed by emotion-focused (R² = 0.765) and problem-focused coping (R² = 0.681). The findings highlight the critical need for interventions promoting sustainable stress management strategies. Enhancing problem-solving behaviors, emotional regulation, and providing organizational support are essential to improve HCWs' well-being and healthcare system resilience during crises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Informatics Education and Research
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i3.1826
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Coping Strategies of Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 in Jaipur, Rajasthan: An Empirical Analysis

Mini Bhatnagar
Journal of Informatics Education and Research
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
article

Assessing the Coping Strategies of Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 in Jaipur, Rajasthan: An Empirical Analysis

Mini Bhatnagar
article en

Abstract

This study explores the coping strategies adopted by healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic and their relationship with stress levels. A balanced representation of doctors and nurses participated, with a slightly higher proportion of males (60%) and most respondents aged 25–44, reflecting a workforce likely to experience significant occupational stress. Among coping strategies, problem-focused approaches, such as planning and addressing stressors, were the most commonly utilized (54% occasionally), though only 9% of HCWs employed them daily due to the high-pressure environment. Emotion-focused strategies, including seeking emotional support, were moderately used (39%) and played a key role in stress management, but only 28% used them daily. Avoidant-focused coping strategies, such as denial and self-distraction, emerged as the most frequently employed daily mechanism (30%), offering short-term relief but raising concerns about long-term stress implications. Regression analysis revealed significant relationships between stress levels and coping mechanisms. Avoidant-focused strategies exhibited the strongest association (R² = 0.812), followed by emotion-focused (R² = 0.765) and problem-focused coping (R² = 0.681). The findings highlight the critical need for interventions promoting sustainable stress management strategies. Enhancing problem-solving behaviors, emotional regulation, and providing organizational support are essential to improve HCWs' well-being and healthcare system resilience during crises.

Journal of Informatics Education and ResearchVol. 4(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.