Immersive Clinical Education Experiences in Athletic Training: A Report From the NATA Professional Education Committee

Context Immersive clinical education experiences (ImCEs) are a recent addition to the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education standards. As such, there is little information on how athletic training programs design and implement ImCEs into the curriculum. Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the structure of ImCEs among athletic training programs and practices relating to identifying and developing ImCEs. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Web-based survey. Patients or Other Participants A total of 103 of 265 Coordinators of Clinical Education for Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education-accredited professional programs participated (women = 69, men = 29, 4 = prefer not to disclose, 1 = unanswered). Main Outcome Measures Coordinators of Clinical Education provided information about their program, timing and length of ImCEs, and the settings used. Program practices for preceptor selection and development, curricular design for simultaneous didactic coursework, and resources available to students were also investigated. Results The average number of ImCEs was 1.9, with a length of 4 to 28 weeks. Most programs have the first ImCE in the second year and primarily rely on college/university and secondary school settings. Programs reporting ImCEs less than 4 weeks in length and those requiring synchronous coursework during clinical immersion are of concern. Conclusions Athletic training programs are integrating ImCEs in a variety of ways. There may be confusion as to best practices and Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education requirements for ImCEs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Athletic Training Education Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4085/1947-380x-24-033
Primary Topic
Athletic Training and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immersive Clinical Education Experiences in Athletic Training: A Report From the NATA Professional Education Committee

Adam B. Rosen, Ashley B. Thrasher, Chyrsten L. Gessel, Kimberly Calvert
Athletic Training Education Journal
Athletic Training and Education
article

Immersive Clinical Education Experiences in Athletic Training: A Report From the NATA Professional Education Committee

Adam B. Rosen, Ashley B. Thrasher, Chyrsten L. Gessel, Kimberly Calvert
article en

Abstract

Context Immersive clinical education experiences (ImCEs) are a recent addition to the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education standards. As such, there is little information on how athletic training programs design and implement ImCEs into the curriculum. Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the structure of ImCEs among athletic training programs and practices relating to identifying and developing ImCEs. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Web-based survey. Patients or Other Participants A total of 103 of 265 Coordinators of Clinical Education for Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education-accredited professional programs participated (women = 69, men = 29, 4 = prefer not to disclose, 1 = unanswered). Main Outcome Measures Coordinators of Clinical Education provided information about their program, timing and length of ImCEs, and the settings used. Program practices for preceptor selection and development, curricular design for simultaneous didactic coursework, and resources available to students were also investigated. Results The average number of ImCEs was 1.9, with a length of 4 to 28 weeks. Most programs have the first ImCE in the second year and primarily rely on college/university and secondary school settings. Programs reporting ImCEs less than 4 weeks in length and those requiring synchronous coursework during clinical immersion are of concern. Conclusions Athletic training programs are integrating ImCEs in a variety of ways. There may be confusion as to best practices and Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education requirements for ImCEs.

Athletic Training Education JournalVol. 19(4)
Western Carolina University (US), University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Athletic Edge Sports Medicine (CA), University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh (US), Marietta College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Athletic Training and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Immersive Clinical Education Experiences in Athletic Training: A Report From the NATA Professional Education Committee — Adam B. Rosen, Ashley B. Thrasher, et al. · Athletic Training Education Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS