From Hell to Heaven: How Climate Risks Hurt the Poor and Climate Finance Heals Them

This study explores the global impact of climate finance on wealth and income inequality, utilizing the IV-GMM model to capture nuanced relationships. Key findings indicate that climate finance effectively reduces both forms of inequality, benefiting low-income populations and suggesting it as a viable tool for inequality reduction. Notably, the impact of climate finance is asymmetric: countries with lower initial inequality levels experience more pronounced benefits, while the effect lessens as inequality increases. Additionally, climate risks—represented by natural disasters— worsen inequality, underscoring climate finance’s dual role in directly reducing inequality and indirectly mitigating disaster impacts. These insights offer valuable policy implications, highlighting climate finance as a means to promote equity and alleviate poverty in the face of escalating climate challenges.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59091/2460-9196.2414
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Hell to Heaven: How Climate Risks Hurt the Poor and Climate Finance Heals Them

Kangyin Dong, Congyu Zhao, Xiucheng Dong
4 citations
Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking
Climate Change Policy and Economics
4.52
article

From Hell to Heaven: How Climate Risks Hurt the Poor and Climate Finance Heals Them

Kangyin Dong, Congyu Zhao, Xiucheng Dong
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study explores the global impact of climate finance on wealth and income inequality, utilizing the IV-GMM model to capture nuanced relationships. Key findings indicate that climate finance effectively reduces both forms of inequality, benefiting low-income populations and suggesting it as a viable tool for inequality reduction. Notably, the impact of climate finance is asymmetric: countries with lower initial inequality levels experience more pronounced benefits, while the effect lessens as inequality increases. Additionally, climate risks—represented by natural disasters— worsen inequality, underscoring climate finance’s dual role in directly reducing inequality and indirectly mitigating disaster impacts. These insights offer valuable policy implications, highlighting climate finance as a means to promote equity and alleviate poverty in the face of escalating climate challenges.

Bulletin of Monetary Economics and BankingVol. 27(4)
National Social Science Fund of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.