Performance comparison of continuous-wave and laser range-gate with continuous-wave time-of-flight and laser range-gate with range resolve active imaging systems

Continuous-wave (CW) and laser range-gate (LRG) imaging are two effective imaging modes for long-range target acquisition and object discrimination. Continuous wave time-of-flight (CWToF) and LRG with range resolve (LRGRR) are modulated versions of CW and LRG that produce 3D imagery of the target. In this study, the sensitivity and range resolution benefits of these four systems are quantified. A performance model is developed and used to compare trade-offs between range resolution and sensitivity for the four active imaging techniques presented. It is found that the LRG-based systems deliver increased performance over the CW-based systems due to higher sensitivity in nighttime circumstances and in degraded visual environments. The results will enable systems engineers to discern whether the added complexity associated with CWToF and LRGRR imaging is worth implementing over traditional approaches such as CW and LRG.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optical Engineering
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.63.12.123102
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance comparison of continuous-wave and laser range-gate with continuous-wave time-of-flight and laser range-gate with range resolve active imaging systems

Joshua Follansbee, Orges Furxhi, Mark F. Spencer, Joshua Teague et al.
1 citations
Optical Engineering
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
0.51
article

Performance comparison of continuous-wave and laser range-gate with continuous-wave time-of-flight and laser range-gate with range resolve active imaging systems

Joshua Follansbee, Orges Furxhi, Mark F. Spencer, Joshua Teague, Ronald G. Driggers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Continuous-wave (CW) and laser range-gate (LRG) imaging are two effective imaging modes for long-range target acquisition and object discrimination. Continuous wave time-of-flight (CWToF) and LRG with range resolve (LRGRR) are modulated versions of CW and LRG that produce 3D imagery of the target. In this study, the sensitivity and range resolution benefits of these four systems are quantified. A performance model is developed and used to compare trade-offs between range resolution and sensitivity for the four active imaging techniques presented. It is found that the LRG-based systems deliver increased performance over the CW-based systems due to higher sensitivity in nighttime circumstances and in degraded visual environments. The results will enable systems engineers to discern whether the added complexity associated with CWToF and LRGRR imaging is worth implementing over traditional approaches such as CW and LRG.

Optical EngineeringVol. 63(12)
University of Arizona (US), Color (United States) (US), Infrared Laboratories (United States) (US), U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.