The CJEU’s Judgment in European Commission v. United Kingdom: A Tale of Truisms, Omissions, and Judicial Fictions

The Micula-saga continues to haunt the relationship of EU state aid law and ICSID Convention. Apparently, even the Brexit of the United Kingdom was insufficient to solve the legal deadlock. That at least seems to be the view taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), who recently held that the UK violated its obligations under EU law by declaring the Micula-award enforceable. In doing so, the CJEU not only ignored the multilateral compliance nature of the obligation to enforce arbitral awards under Article 54 ICSID Convention, but also jumped quite some hurdles in relation to other issues of EU law. All in all, a tale of truism, omissions and judicial fictions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eila2024040
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The CJEU’s Judgment in European Commission v. United Kingdom: A Tale of Truisms, Omissions, and Judicial Fictions

Simon Hermes
European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online
European and International Law Studies
article

The CJEU’s Judgment in European Commission v. United Kingdom: A Tale of Truisms, Omissions, and Judicial Fictions

Simon Hermes
article en

Abstract

The Micula-saga continues to haunt the relationship of EU state aid law and ICSID Convention. Apparently, even the Brexit of the United Kingdom was insufficient to solve the legal deadlock. That at least seems to be the view taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), who recently held that the UK violated its obligations under EU law by declaring the Micula-award enforceable. In doing so, the CJEU not only ignored the multilateral compliance nature of the obligation to enforce arbitral awards under Article 54 ICSID Convention, but also jumped quite some hurdles in relation to other issues of EU law. All in all, a tale of truism, omissions and judicial fictions.

European Investment Law and Arbitration Review OnlineVol. 9(Issue 2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.