Case Note: A Friendly Preference? The Amicus Curiae Brief in the Nextera Case

This paper examines the arguments put forth in an amicus curiae brief submitted in the US in NextEra Energy (Netherlands) v. Kingdom of Spain regarding the enforcement of an intra-EU ICSID arbitration award. The author argues that the brief promotes an uncompromising reading of ICSID members’ obligations that overlooks legitimate complexities at the intersection of investment law and EU law. In doing so, it encapsulates a view increasingly prevalent within the international arbitration community that privileges maintaining arbitration as the favoured mechanism for resolving investor-state disputes over reconciling potential tensions with regional economic frameworks like the EU legal order. However, a critical analysis finds the brief presents authorities selectively and minimizes complexities at the intersection of investment law and EU law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eila2024036
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case Note: A Friendly Preference? The Amicus Curiae Brief in the Nextera Case

János Katona
European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Case Note: A Friendly Preference? The Amicus Curiae Brief in the Nextera Case

János Katona
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the arguments put forth in an amicus curiae brief submitted in the US in NextEra Energy (Netherlands) v. Kingdom of Spain regarding the enforcement of an intra-EU ICSID arbitration award. The author argues that the brief promotes an uncompromising reading of ICSID members’ obligations that overlooks legitimate complexities at the intersection of investment law and EU law. In doing so, it encapsulates a view increasingly prevalent within the international arbitration community that privileges maintaining arbitration as the favoured mechanism for resolving investor-state disputes over reconciling potential tensions with regional economic frameworks like the EU legal order. However, a critical analysis finds the brief presents authorities selectively and minimizes complexities at the intersection of investment law and EU law.

European Investment Law and Arbitration Review OnlineVol. 9(Issue 2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.