Piracy, Plagiarism, and Shifting Meanings. The Case of the Publication of Hore di ricreatione by Lodovico Guicciardini

This paper focuses on the little-known case of editorial piracy committed by the printer and polygraph Francesco Sansovino (1521–1586) to the detriment of Lodovico Guicciardini (1521–1589), nephew of the more famous Francesco, who had settled in Antwerp. As the numerous editions and reprints testify, the Hore di ricreatione enjoyed remarkable success throughout Europe. On the contrary, the initial editorial piracy of which it was the object remained an almost private matter. The study of the proemial parts of the work allows us to clearly observe the differences between the author’s intentions and those of the Venetian printer. If the former was driven by the pursuit of fame and by his cultural background, the latter was driven by the market and the preferences of his readers. Exploring the different meaning they attached to the text highlights the often conflicting dynamics between author and printer in the Renaissance, and also offers a glimpse into the world of sixteenth-century printing from a particular perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Terminus
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843844te.24.010.20387
Primary Topic
Renaissance Literature and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Piracy, Plagiarism, and Shifting Meanings. The Case of the Publication of Hore di ricreatione by Lodovico Guicciardini

Valentina Lepri
Terminus
Renaissance Literature and Culture
article

Piracy, Plagiarism, and Shifting Meanings. The Case of the Publication of Hore di ricreatione by Lodovico Guicciardini

Valentina Lepri
article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on the little-known case of editorial piracy committed by the printer and polygraph Francesco Sansovino (1521–1586) to the detriment of Lodovico Guicciardini (1521–1589), nephew of the more famous Francesco, who had settled in Antwerp. As the numerous editions and reprints testify, the Hore di ricreatione enjoyed remarkable success throughout Europe. On the contrary, the initial editorial piracy of which it was the object remained an almost private matter. The study of the proemial parts of the work allows us to clearly observe the differences between the author’s intentions and those of the Venetian printer. If the former was driven by the pursuit of fame and by his cultural background, the latter was driven by the market and the preferences of his readers. Exploring the different meaning they attached to the text highlights the often conflicting dynamics between author and printer in the Renaissance, and also offers a glimpse into the world of sixteenth-century printing from a particular perspective.

TerminusVol. 26(2 (71))
Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Renaissance Literature and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Piracy, Plagiarism, and Shifting Meanings. The Case of the Publication of Hore di ricreatione by Lodovico Guicciardini — Valentina Lepri · Terminus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS