A DUAL-CIRCUIT CAUSAL MODEL OF BRAIN STIMULATION TARGETS FOR DEPRESSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in the treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), focusing on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), intellectual disorders, learning disorders, motor disorders, and Tourette and tic related disorders across various age groups.Following a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022384498) and adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of five databases (Embase, Central, PsycInfo, PubMed/Medline, and Scopus) was conducted.Out of 23 identified studies, 15 were included in the meta-analysis.Qualitative risk of bias assessment revealed ten studies with low risk, one with high risk, and some concerns for the remaining twelve.In the quantitative analysis, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) demonstrated a statistically significant overall cognitive improvement in ADHD compared to sham (Hedge's g = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.16 to 1.26, p = 0.01), while transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) showed a statistically significant overall cognitive improvement in ASD compared to sham (Hedge's g = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.40, p = 0.02).No publication bias was observed in either analysis.Despite promising results, the limited number of studies and concerns about bias underscore the need for further research on NIBS for NDDs.This review emphasizes the significance of standardized methodology and comparable outcome measures in future trials and stresses the value of replicating evidence for potentially effective treatment protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transcranial magnetic stimulation .
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transm.2024.100061
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A DUAL-CIRCUIT CAUSAL MODEL OF BRAIN STIMULATION TARGETS FOR DEPRESSION

Summer Frandsen, Andrea A. Kühn, Mark S. George, Darin D. Dougherty et al.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation .
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

A DUAL-CIRCUIT CAUSAL MODEL OF BRAIN STIMULATION TARGETS FOR DEPRESSION

Summer Frandsen, Andrea A. Kühn, Mark S. George, Darin D. Dougherty, Helen S. Mayberg, Andrew Zalesky, Shan H. Siddiqi, Robin Cash, Andreas Horn, Fidel Vila‐Rodriguez, Jonathan H. Downar, Jordan Grafman, Rob P.W. Rouhl, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Yasin Temel, Ki Sueng Choi, Frédéric Schaper, Patricio Riva‐Posse, Stephan F. Taylor, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Friederike Grospietsch, Kevin A. Johnson, Daniel M. Blumberger, Cory Glover
article en

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in the treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), focusing on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), intellectual disorders, learning disorders, motor disorders, and Tourette and tic related disorders across various age groups.Following a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022384498) and adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of five databases (Embase, Central, PsycInfo, PubMed/Medline, and Scopus) was conducted.Out of 23 identified studies, 15 were included in the meta-analysis.Qualitative risk of bias assessment revealed ten studies with low risk, one with high risk, and some concerns for the remaining twelve.In the quantitative analysis, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) demonstrated a statistically significant overall cognitive improvement in ADHD compared to sham (Hedge's g = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.16 to 1.26, p = 0.01), while transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) showed a statistically significant overall cognitive improvement in ASD compared to sham (Hedge's g = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.40, p = 0.02).No publication bias was observed in either analysis.Despite promising results, the limited number of studies and concerns about bias underscore the need for further research on NIBS for NDDs.This review emphasizes the significance of standardized methodology and comparable outcome measures in future trials and stresses the value of replicating evidence for potentially effective treatment protocols.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation .Vol. 1
Florida State University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), Harvard University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Emory University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Toronto (CA), University of Michigan (US), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives (FR), Hebrew SeniorLife (US), Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center (US), Monash University (AU), Brandeis University (US), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Universidad del Noreste (MX), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.