Transition of land use/cover in world heritage cities under climate crisis

• Underdeveloped World Heritage Cities are more vulnerable to climate change. • The intensity map reveals land use/cover change patterns and tendencies. • Bare areas are “greening”, yet grassland and wetlands continue to degrade. • Some forests and impervious surfaces are undergoing “cultivation”. World Heritage Cities (WHCs) contain profound historical legacies and distinctive architectural styles. However, climate change significantly influences land use/cover (LUC) patterns, with both direct and indirect implications for the preservation of cultural heritage integrity and authenticity, as well as for urban sustainability. This study focused on WHCs identified as climate disadvantages by the ND-GAIN Country Index. We employed transfer matrices and dynamic degree models to analyze the spatial and temporal dynamics of LUC over four periods (2000–2005, 2005–2010, 2010–2015, and 2015–2020). Furthermore, intensity map was utilized to comprehensively analyze the transition tendencies, including inflows and outflows, absolute and relative intensities, and their impacts on LUC structures. The results reveal the following key findings: (1) Between 2000 and 2020, 20 WHCs with climate disadvantages are primarily located in South America, Africa, and Asia. (2) Bare areas constitute the dominant land cover (51.40% to 52.82%), while impervious surfaces are less and scattered (0.15% to 0.25%). (3) Although some bare areas tend to be outflowed as sparse vegetation, the degree of “greening” remained insufficient. The transition from grassland to sparse vegetation displays a systematic tendency, highlighting the risk of continuous degradation. (4) Instances of “counter-urbanization”, where impervious surfaces transition into rain-fed and irrigated croplands, has minimal impact on overall urbanization trends. (5) Forests exhibit complex and dynamic interconversions, while wetlands and irrigated cropland tend to degrade into bare areas and rain-fed cropland, indicating an increasing risk of aridification. This study provides effective data support to enhance the understanding of how climate change affects LUC in WHCs, contributing to formulating more sustainable urban planning and land management policies and maintaining the preservation and protection of world heritages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112972
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transition of land use/cover in world heritage cities under climate crisis

Yinshuai Li, Nan Jia, Chenglong Yin, Ruishan Chen
3 citations
Ecological Indicators
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
0.85
article

Transition of land use/cover in world heritage cities under climate crisis

Yinshuai Li, Nan Jia, Chenglong Yin, Ruishan Chen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Underdeveloped World Heritage Cities are more vulnerable to climate change. • The intensity map reveals land use/cover change patterns and tendencies. • Bare areas are “greening”, yet grassland and wetlands continue to degrade. • Some forests and impervious surfaces are undergoing “cultivation”. World Heritage Cities (WHCs) contain profound historical legacies and distinctive architectural styles. However, climate change significantly influences land use/cover (LUC) patterns, with both direct and indirect implications for the preservation of cultural heritage integrity and authenticity, as well as for urban sustainability. This study focused on WHCs identified as climate disadvantages by the ND-GAIN Country Index. We employed transfer matrices and dynamic degree models to analyze the spatial and temporal dynamics of LUC over four periods (2000–2005, 2005–2010, 2010–2015, and 2015–2020). Furthermore, intensity map was utilized to comprehensively analyze the transition tendencies, including inflows and outflows, absolute and relative intensities, and their impacts on LUC structures. The results reveal the following key findings: (1) Between 2000 and 2020, 20 WHCs with climate disadvantages are primarily located in South America, Africa, and Asia. (2) Bare areas constitute the dominant land cover (51.40% to 52.82%), while impervious surfaces are less and scattered (0.15% to 0.25%). (3) Although some bare areas tend to be outflowed as sparse vegetation, the degree of “greening” remained insufficient. The transition from grassland to sparse vegetation displays a systematic tendency, highlighting the risk of continuous degradation. (4) Instances of “counter-urbanization”, where impervious surfaces transition into rain-fed and irrigated croplands, has minimal impact on overall urbanization trends. (5) Forests exhibit complex and dynamic interconversions, while wetlands and irrigated cropland tend to degrade into bare areas and rain-fed cropland, indicating an increasing risk of aridification. This study provides effective data support to enhance the understanding of how climate change affects LUC in WHCs, contributing to formulating more sustainable urban planning and land management policies and maintaining the preservation and protection of world heritages.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 169
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), East China Normal University (CN), Michigan State University (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.