Hands-On Robotic Microsurgery: Robotic-Assisted Free Flap Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) has been introduced into the field of plastic surgery in recent years. It potentially offers enhanced precision and control compared to traditional methods, which is crucial for complex microvascular tasks in free flap reconstructions. We aim to analyze our experiences with robotic-assisted microsurgery in the field of upper extremity free flap reconstruction. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Symani Surgical System for free flap reconstructions in 16 patients with upper extremity defects at our institution from February 2023 to March 2024. Operating times were compared to a matched, historical cohort. We collected data on surgical outcomes, operative times, and complication rates, following strict adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki. <b>Results</b>: Our cohort primarily involved male patients (81%) with defects mostly located on the hand (81%). The anterolateral thigh flap was the most commonly used free flap (14/16, 88%). The average operative time was 368 ± 89 min (range: 216-550 min). No complete or partial flap losses were observed, but one flap required revision surgery due to arterial thrombosis. Major complications occurred in 13% of the cases. The average anastomosis time was 31 ± 12 min (range: 20-35 min) for arterial end-to-end anastomoses and 33 ± 13 min (range: 20-60 min) for arterial end-to-side anastomoses. Venous anastomoses required, on average, 20 ± 6 min. Operating times were not significantly longer when compared to the historical cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.67). <b>Conclusions</b>: We were able to show comparable outcomes to conventional microsurgery, while requiring more time for the microsurgical anastomoses. The study highlights the need for larger, controlled trials to better understand the benefits and limitations of robotic assistance in microsurgical reconstruction of the upper extremity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237450
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hands-On Robotic Microsurgery: Robotic-Assisted Free Flap Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity

Emre Gazyakan, Amir K. Bigdeli, Jonathan Weigel, Felix Strübing et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
2.29
article

Hands-On Robotic Microsurgery: Robotic-Assisted Free Flap Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity

Emre Gazyakan, Amir K. Bigdeli, Jonathan Weigel, Felix Strübing, Ulrich Kneser, Arne H. Boecker
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) has been introduced into the field of plastic surgery in recent years. It potentially offers enhanced precision and control compared to traditional methods, which is crucial for complex microvascular tasks in free flap reconstructions. We aim to analyze our experiences with robotic-assisted microsurgery in the field of upper extremity free flap reconstruction. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Symani Surgical System for free flap reconstructions in 16 patients with upper extremity defects at our institution from February 2023 to March 2024. Operating times were compared to a matched, historical cohort. We collected data on surgical outcomes, operative times, and complication rates, following strict adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki. <b>Results</b>: Our cohort primarily involved male patients (81%) with defects mostly located on the hand (81%). The anterolateral thigh flap was the most commonly used free flap (14/16, 88%). The average operative time was 368 ± 89 min (range: 216-550 min). No complete or partial flap losses were observed, but one flap required revision surgery due to arterial thrombosis. Major complications occurred in 13% of the cases. The average anastomosis time was 31 ± 12 min (range: 20-35 min) for arterial end-to-end anastomoses and 33 ± 13 min (range: 20-60 min) for arterial end-to-side anastomoses. Venous anastomoses required, on average, 20 ± 6 min. Operating times were not significantly longer when compared to the historical cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.67). <b>Conclusions</b>: We were able to show comparable outcomes to conventional microsurgery, while requiring more time for the microsurgical anastomoses. The study highlights the need for larger, controlled trials to better understand the benefits and limitations of robotic assistance in microsurgical reconstruction of the upper extremity.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(23)
Heidelberg University (DE), Ludwigshafen University of Business and Society (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.