How Digitalization and Its Context Affect the Urban–Rural Income Gap: A Configurational Analysis Based on 274 Prefecture-Level Administrative Regions in China

Digitalization offers an opportunity to narrow the economic gap between urban and rural areas; however, there are fragmented and competing explanations regarding its impact mechanisms. Responding to calls for research on the complex effects of digitalization, this paper, based on a contextual perspective and configurational theory, analyzes the impact of digitalization conditions embedded in contexts on the urban–rural income gap. The study, based on a sample of 274 prefecture-level administrative regions in China from 2014 to 2021, employs a Panel Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Panel fsQCA) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA). The combined application of necessity analysis and sufficiency analysis reveals that certain digitalization conditions—such as digital infrastructure, digital industry, and digital finance—have a universal influence on the urban–rural income gap. Importantly, the sufficiency analysis demonstrates that the impact mechanisms of digitalization conditions exhibit configurational effects, varying with changes in contextual and conditional combinations. The models that significantly narrow the urban–rural income gap include (1) the “infrastructure–finance–governance” model, (2) the comprehensive digital transformation model, (3) the “technology–infrastructure–industry” model, and (4) the digital infrastructure transformation model. Among these, the comprehensive digital transformation model is the most universally effective. These configurations reflect the logic of completeness and substitutability and exhibit specific dynamic evolutionary trends and spatial distribution characteristics. These findings provide contextual and adaptable empirical insights for economies, including China, to implement targeted digital transformation strategies that effectively narrow the urban–rural income gap. For instance, economies can focus on developing comprehensive digital transformation in prosperous and open regions to reduce income gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122118
Citations
4
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Digitalization and Its Context Affect the Urban–Rural Income Gap: A Configurational Analysis Based on 274 Prefecture-Level Administrative Regions in China

Shuijin Zhu, Shuigen Hu, Lie’en Weng, Yulong Jie
4 citations
Land
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
8.92
article

How Digitalization and Its Context Affect the Urban–Rural Income Gap: A Configurational Analysis Based on 274 Prefecture-Level Administrative Regions in China

Shuijin Zhu, Shuigen Hu, Lie’en Weng, Yulong Jie
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Digitalization offers an opportunity to narrow the economic gap between urban and rural areas; however, there are fragmented and competing explanations regarding its impact mechanisms. Responding to calls for research on the complex effects of digitalization, this paper, based on a contextual perspective and configurational theory, analyzes the impact of digitalization conditions embedded in contexts on the urban–rural income gap. The study, based on a sample of 274 prefecture-level administrative regions in China from 2014 to 2021, employs a Panel Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Panel fsQCA) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA). The combined application of necessity analysis and sufficiency analysis reveals that certain digitalization conditions—such as digital infrastructure, digital industry, and digital finance—have a universal influence on the urban–rural income gap. Importantly, the sufficiency analysis demonstrates that the impact mechanisms of digitalization conditions exhibit configurational effects, varying with changes in contextual and conditional combinations. The models that significantly narrow the urban–rural income gap include (1) the “infrastructure–finance–governance” model, (2) the comprehensive digital transformation model, (3) the “technology–infrastructure–industry” model, and (4) the digital infrastructure transformation model. Among these, the comprehensive digital transformation model is the most universally effective. These configurations reflect the logic of completeness and substitutability and exhibit specific dynamic evolutionary trends and spatial distribution characteristics. These findings provide contextual and adaptable empirical insights for economies, including China, to implement targeted digital transformation strategies that effectively narrow the urban–rural income gap. For instance, economies can focus on developing comprehensive digital transformation in prosperous and open regions to reduce income gap.

LandVol. 13(12)
Zhejiang University of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
8.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.