Integrating Broad Panel Somatic and Germline Testing in Prostate Cancer Care

Introduction: Genetic testing, including germline and tumor testing, using broad panel-based approaches has transformed treatment strategies for metastatic prostate cancer. Despite guideline consensus that all men with metastatic prostate cancer should undergo tumor testing to identify mutations, suboptimal testing rates diminish the impact genetic testing can have on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions. This article outlines the various barriers to clinical adoption and implementation of broad panel genetic testing in the prostate cancer care continuum and opportunities for addressing these challenges. Methods: A landscape assessment and literature review were conducted across medical databases as well as oncologic and urologic websites to assess the current guidelines and state of broad panel genetic testing in prostate cancer. Results: There are numerous barriers and clinical practice gaps that hinder implementation and integration of broad panel somatic and germline testing in prostate cancer clinical care. Identified areas of concern include patient identification, test ordering considerations, cost and payer coverage, sample collection, genetic education and interpretation of test results, and social inequities. These barriers have prevented guideline concordance and optimal care for patients with prostate cancer. Conclusions: Overall outcomes significantly improve for patients whose treatments are tailored to findings from genetic testing. The development of comprehensive care pathways that close clinical care gaps is necessary to ensure the continued optimization of broad panel genetic testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JU Open Plus
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000240
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Broad Panel Somatic and Germline Testing in Prostate Cancer Care

David Michael Waterhouse, Ralph J. Henderson, Ibrahim Khilfeh, Jacqueline E. Reilly et al.
2 citations
JU Open Plus
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
0.84
article

Integrating Broad Panel Somatic and Germline Testing in Prostate Cancer Care

David Michael Waterhouse, Ralph J. Henderson, Ibrahim Khilfeh, Jacqueline E. Reilly, Kim Svoboda, Robert A. Bailey
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Genetic testing, including germline and tumor testing, using broad panel-based approaches has transformed treatment strategies for metastatic prostate cancer. Despite guideline consensus that all men with metastatic prostate cancer should undergo tumor testing to identify mutations, suboptimal testing rates diminish the impact genetic testing can have on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions. This article outlines the various barriers to clinical adoption and implementation of broad panel genetic testing in the prostate cancer care continuum and opportunities for addressing these challenges. Methods: A landscape assessment and literature review were conducted across medical databases as well as oncologic and urologic websites to assess the current guidelines and state of broad panel genetic testing in prostate cancer. Results: There are numerous barriers and clinical practice gaps that hinder implementation and integration of broad panel somatic and germline testing in prostate cancer clinical care. Identified areas of concern include patient identification, test ordering considerations, cost and payer coverage, sample collection, genetic education and interpretation of test results, and social inequities. These barriers have prevented guideline concordance and optimal care for patients with prostate cancer. Conclusions: Overall outcomes significantly improve for patients whose treatments are tailored to findings from genetic testing. The development of comprehensive care pathways that close clinical care gaps is necessary to ensure the continued optimization of broad panel genetic testing.

JU Open PlusVol. 2(12)
Arkansas Cardiology (US), Janssen (United States) (US), Oncology Hematology Care (US), Janssen Scientific Affairs (United States)
Janssen Scientific Affairs
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.