Unveiling differences in biodiversity conservation efficiency across multi-level ecological networks under future climate change scenarios

• Multi-level ecological networks emphasize multiple species consideration. • Three key hotspots in the study area were identified. • Smaller scale but higher-priority networks show greater conservation efficiency. • Constructing multi-level ecological networks support the GBF. Constructing ecological networks between protected areas is crucial for preventing further biodiversity loss. Considering the variations among protected areas, developing multi-level ecological networks can optimize resource allocation. However, the future effectiveness of these multi-level networks in protecting biodiversity remains unclear. In this study, we considered aspects including the distribution of endangered species, the impact of climate change, and human activity to identify ecological sources at different levels and established multi-level ecological corridors. We then evaluated the biodiversity conservation efficiency of multi-level ecological networks under future climate change scenarios. The results showed that high-priority ecological corridors are primarily concentrated in the southwestern part of the Yangtze River Delta, gradually extending eastward, while ecological corridors in the northern region are of relatively lower priority. Significant differences were also observed in the conservation efficiency of ecological networks at different levels. Under future climate change scenarios (SSP 126, 245, 370, and 585), smaller scale but higher-priority ecological networks (Level 1 and Level 2) demonstrated higher conservation efficiency, reaching 75.36% and 61.13%, respectively. In contrast, larger scale but lower-priority ecological networks (Level 3 and Level 4) had conservation efficiency below 50%. These results highlight that the prioritization of ecological networks should be considered during their construction and implementation, as it is essential to their future contributions to biodiversity conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112933
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling differences in biodiversity conservation efficiency across multi-level ecological networks under future climate change scenarios

Qiqi Liu, Xiaolan Tang, Youngkeun Song, Tian Hang et al.
7 citations
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.98
article

Unveiling differences in biodiversity conservation efficiency across multi-level ecological networks under future climate change scenarios

Qiqi Liu, Xiaolan Tang, Youngkeun Song, Tian Hang, Yunfei Wu
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• Multi-level ecological networks emphasize multiple species consideration. • Three key hotspots in the study area were identified. • Smaller scale but higher-priority networks show greater conservation efficiency. • Constructing multi-level ecological networks support the GBF. Constructing ecological networks between protected areas is crucial for preventing further biodiversity loss. Considering the variations among protected areas, developing multi-level ecological networks can optimize resource allocation. However, the future effectiveness of these multi-level networks in protecting biodiversity remains unclear. In this study, we considered aspects including the distribution of endangered species, the impact of climate change, and human activity to identify ecological sources at different levels and established multi-level ecological corridors. We then evaluated the biodiversity conservation efficiency of multi-level ecological networks under future climate change scenarios. The results showed that high-priority ecological corridors are primarily concentrated in the southwestern part of the Yangtze River Delta, gradually extending eastward, while ecological corridors in the northern region are of relatively lower priority. Significant differences were also observed in the conservation efficiency of ecological networks at different levels. Under future climate change scenarios (SSP 126, 245, 370, and 585), smaller scale but higher-priority ecological networks (Level 1 and Level 2) demonstrated higher conservation efficiency, reaching 75.36% and 61.13%, respectively. In contrast, larger scale but lower-priority ecological networks (Level 3 and Level 4) had conservation efficiency below 50%. These results highlight that the prioritization of ecological networks should be considered during their construction and implementation, as it is essential to their future contributions to biodiversity conservation.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 169
Seoul National University (KR), Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.