Why is the uptake of decentralised elements in clinical trials slower than expected?

In the swiftly changing realm of clinical research, incorporating decentralised elements into clinical trials is becoming a transformative approach to drug development. Driving this approach is the need to not only improve the desirability of participating in clinical trials by reducing participant burden but also increase the utility of the data/evidence collected. The philosophy guiding this approach is both participant- and site-centred, thus ensuring decentralised elements truly add value to the clinical trial experience while still meeting a trial’s scientific objectives. As the potential benefits of these innovative trial methodologies have become more clear, regulatory agencies worldwide have released numerous guidelines for incorporating decentralised elements into clinical trials. Despite these promising benefits and regulatory guidance, the adoption of these elements has not progressed as rapidly as anticipated. This commentary delves into some of the factors sponsors consider with regard to integrating decentralised elements into clinical trials and discusses several challenges they face in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulatory Affairs Watch
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54920/scto.2024.rawatch.9.20
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why is the uptake of decentralised elements in clinical trials slower than expected?

Elizabeth Theogaraj, Jim Wingate, Lada Leyens
1 citations
Regulatory Affairs Watch
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
0.33
article

Why is the uptake of decentralised elements in clinical trials slower than expected?

Elizabeth Theogaraj, Jim Wingate, Lada Leyens
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the swiftly changing realm of clinical research, incorporating decentralised elements into clinical trials is becoming a transformative approach to drug development. Driving this approach is the need to not only improve the desirability of participating in clinical trials by reducing participant burden but also increase the utility of the data/evidence collected. The philosophy guiding this approach is both participant- and site-centred, thus ensuring decentralised elements truly add value to the clinical trial experience while still meeting a trial’s scientific objectives. As the potential benefits of these innovative trial methodologies have become more clear, regulatory agencies worldwide have released numerous guidelines for incorporating decentralised elements into clinical trials. Despite these promising benefits and regulatory guidance, the adoption of these elements has not progressed as rapidly as anticipated. This commentary delves into some of the factors sponsors consider with regard to integrating decentralised elements into clinical trials and discusses several challenges they face in practice.

Regulatory Affairs WatchVol. 6(9)
Roche (Sweden) (SE), Takeda (Japan) (JP), La Roche College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why is the uptake of decentralised elements in clinical trials slower than expected? — Elizabeth Theogaraj, Jim Wingate, et al. · Regulatory Affairs Watch (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS