Size Does Matter: Mastectomy Flap Thickness as an Independent Decisional Factor for the Peri-Prosthetic Device Choice in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

<b>Background.</b> In alloplastic breast reconstruction, the choice of implant positioning and the selection of periprosthetic devices is a critical and challenging decision. Surgeons must navigate between various biologic and synthetic meshes, including acellular dermal matrices (ADM). This study aimed to propose a simple selection tool for periprosthetic devices in prepectoral breast reconstruction. <b>Methods.</b> Patients scheduled for mastectomy followed by implant-based breast reconstruction between September 2019 and December 2023 were included. Preoperative risk assessments were performed using the Pre-Bra Score, and only those deemed suitable for prepectoral implant placement were selected. Mastectomy flap thickness was used as an independent criterion, and only cases with flap thicknesses less than 1 cm were included. <b>Results.</b> A total of 70 cases with an average flap thickness of 0.7 cm (range, 0.4-0.9 cm), as measured by preoperative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), underwent prepectoral reconstruction with ADM covering the implant. Of these, 25 patients (35%) received direct-to-implant reconstruction, while 45 (65%) underwent two-stage reconstruction with a temporary tissue expander. Postoperative complications were recorded during a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Over an average follow-up duration of 17.5 months (range 6-36 months), no major complications were observed. Minor complications occurred in seven patients: infection (1.28%), seroma (3.85%), and superficial skin necrosis (1.28%). Additionally, 21 patients (30%) experienced rippling, and secondary lipofilling was scheduled. <b>Conclusions.</b> The incidence of rippling was reduced by 40% through ADM in this patient subgroup, reducing the need for secondary aesthetic refinements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237459
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Size Does Matter: Mastectomy Flap Thickness as an Independent Decisional Factor for the Peri-Prosthetic Device Choice in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Marco Marcasciano, Silvia Sordi, Gianluigi Luridiana, Juste Kaciulyte et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.29
article

Size Does Matter: Mastectomy Flap Thickness as an Independent Decisional Factor for the Peri-Prosthetic Device Choice in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Marco Marcasciano, Silvia Sordi, Gianluigi Luridiana, Juste Kaciulyte, Warren M. Rozen, Federico Lo Torto, Ishith Seth, Donato Casella, Roberto Cuomo, Diego Ribuffo, Luca Codolini, Enrico Cavalieri
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background.</b> In alloplastic breast reconstruction, the choice of implant positioning and the selection of periprosthetic devices is a critical and challenging decision. Surgeons must navigate between various biologic and synthetic meshes, including acellular dermal matrices (ADM). This study aimed to propose a simple selection tool for periprosthetic devices in prepectoral breast reconstruction. <b>Methods.</b> Patients scheduled for mastectomy followed by implant-based breast reconstruction between September 2019 and December 2023 were included. Preoperative risk assessments were performed using the Pre-Bra Score, and only those deemed suitable for prepectoral implant placement were selected. Mastectomy flap thickness was used as an independent criterion, and only cases with flap thicknesses less than 1 cm were included. <b>Results.</b> A total of 70 cases with an average flap thickness of 0.7 cm (range, 0.4-0.9 cm), as measured by preoperative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), underwent prepectoral reconstruction with ADM covering the implant. Of these, 25 patients (35%) received direct-to-implant reconstruction, while 45 (65%) underwent two-stage reconstruction with a temporary tissue expander. Postoperative complications were recorded during a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Over an average follow-up duration of 17.5 months (range 6-36 months), no major complications were observed. Minor complications occurred in seven patients: infection (1.28%), seroma (3.85%), and superficial skin necrosis (1.28%). Additionally, 21 patients (30%) experienced rippling, and secondary lipofilling was scheduled. <b>Conclusions.</b> The incidence of rippling was reduced by 40% through ADM in this patient subgroup, reducing the need for secondary aesthetic refinements.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(23)
University of Siena (IT), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Frankston Hospital (AU), Magna Graecia University (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT), Peninsula Health (AU), Azienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.