Therapeutic implications of narrow or positive surgical margins in head and neck tumors

Introduction The treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region involves a multidisciplinary approach that combines surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Aim The aim of this article is to discuss the therapeutic implications of narrow or positive surgical margins in head and neck cancers. Material and methods The article was written based on the analysis of the literature on the subject. Results and discussion Surgical resection is an important part of a approach to treatment and the adequacy of resection during surgery is determined by the margin status. A margin greater than 5 mm is considered free, less than 5 mm - narrow, and less than one mm is considered positive. For proper planning of radiotherapy, i.e. adequate selection of areas and doses, the following are necessary: imaging, endoscopy, pathology report. It should also be remembered that the lack of important information from the treatment and the fear of making a geographical error and/or not matching the dose to the actual stage of the disease and the status of the margins; affects the decision of the radiotherapist who will escalate the dose, which may lead to long-term tissue damage with loss of their function and significantly affect the quality of life of these patients. Conclusions Before initiating treatment, each patient should undergo analysis in multidisciplinary consultations to tailor the optimal therapeutic decision to the stage of the disease and any coexisting conditions.Patients with advanced disease and/or challenging localization and/or rare disease diagnoses should be treated in highly specialized centers where close collaboration between facilities is essential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Elbingensia
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61785/ael/195121
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Therapeutic implications of narrow or positive surgical margins in head and neck tumors

Janusz Winiecki, Marta Biedka-Paluch, Patryk Biedka
Acta Elbingensia
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Therapeutic implications of narrow or positive surgical margins in head and neck tumors

Janusz Winiecki, Marta Biedka-Paluch, Patryk Biedka
article en

Abstract

Introduction The treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region involves a multidisciplinary approach that combines surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Aim The aim of this article is to discuss the therapeutic implications of narrow or positive surgical margins in head and neck cancers. Material and methods The article was written based on the analysis of the literature on the subject. Results and discussion Surgical resection is an important part of a approach to treatment and the adequacy of resection during surgery is determined by the margin status. A margin greater than 5 mm is considered free, less than 5 mm - narrow, and less than one mm is considered positive. For proper planning of radiotherapy, i.e. adequate selection of areas and doses, the following are necessary: imaging, endoscopy, pathology report. It should also be remembered that the lack of important information from the treatment and the fear of making a geographical error and/or not matching the dose to the actual stage of the disease and the status of the margins; affects the decision of the radiotherapist who will escalate the dose, which may lead to long-term tissue damage with loss of their function and significantly affect the quality of life of these patients. Conclusions Before initiating treatment, each patient should undergo analysis in multidisciplinary consultations to tailor the optimal therapeutic decision to the stage of the disease and any coexisting conditions.Patients with advanced disease and/or challenging localization and/or rare disease diagnoses should be treated in highly specialized centers where close collaboration between facilities is essential.

Acta Elbingensia
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.