Stigmatizing attitudes and endorsement of coercive interventions for hoarding

Hoarding disorder is a stigmatized condition, but little research has examined the attitudes of professional service providers who encounter hoarding in homes they enter as part of their work. These providers have essential roles in identifying and intervening with hoarding, but the degree to which they hold stigmatizing attitudes has not been studied. Using an online questionnaire, the present study sought to compare hoarding service providers with non-professionals along several dimensions of hoarding stigma: blame, desire for social distance, stereotypes about incompetence, and the endorsement of coercive treatment methods were examined. Overall, members of the professional sample endorsed less blame and desire for social distance from hoarding clients. However, the samples did not differ in beliefs about the incompetence of hoarding clients or endorsement of coercive methods in hoarding interventions. Stigmatizing attitudes about mental illness in general consistently predicted hoarding stigma in both samples. Providers who expressed more professional confidence in working with hoarding endorsed less blaming attitudes and less desire for social distance, but providers who work in more enforcement-oriented roles endorsed desire for more social distance from hoarding clients. This study provides a first glimpse at hoarding-related stigma among professional service providers, and further insight into the general public’s perception of hoarding relative to other mental illnesses. Findings about the predictors of hoarding stigma provide potential directions for anti-stigma interventions. • Hoarding service providers endorse less blame stigma about hoarding • Stigma about other mental illnesses predicts hoarding stigma • Professional confidence predicts less client blame but also a preference for less social contact • Enforcement-based hoarding service providers show more social distance stigma

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100933
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stigmatizing attitudes and endorsement of coercive interventions for hoarding

Christiana Bratiotis, Sheila R. Woody, Persephone Larkin, Simon B. Sheppard
2 citations
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
1.28
article

Stigmatizing attitudes and endorsement of coercive interventions for hoarding

Christiana Bratiotis, Sheila R. Woody, Persephone Larkin, Simon B. Sheppard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Hoarding disorder is a stigmatized condition, but little research has examined the attitudes of professional service providers who encounter hoarding in homes they enter as part of their work. These providers have essential roles in identifying and intervening with hoarding, but the degree to which they hold stigmatizing attitudes has not been studied. Using an online questionnaire, the present study sought to compare hoarding service providers with non-professionals along several dimensions of hoarding stigma: blame, desire for social distance, stereotypes about incompetence, and the endorsement of coercive treatment methods were examined. Overall, members of the professional sample endorsed less blame and desire for social distance from hoarding clients. However, the samples did not differ in beliefs about the incompetence of hoarding clients or endorsement of coercive methods in hoarding interventions. Stigmatizing attitudes about mental illness in general consistently predicted hoarding stigma in both samples. Providers who expressed more professional confidence in working with hoarding endorsed less blaming attitudes and less desire for social distance, but providers who work in more enforcement-oriented roles endorsed desire for more social distance from hoarding clients. This study provides a first glimpse at hoarding-related stigma among professional service providers, and further insight into the general public’s perception of hoarding relative to other mental illnesses. Findings about the predictors of hoarding stigma provide potential directions for anti-stigma interventions. • Hoarding service providers endorse less blame stigma about hoarding • Stigma about other mental illnesses predicts hoarding stigma • Professional confidence predicts less client blame but also a preference for less social contact • Enforcement-based hoarding service providers show more social distance stigma

Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related DisordersVol. 44
University of British Columbia (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.