Network properties of the global waste trade

The network properties of the global waste trade were assessed by using time series data of material and monetary flows between 2000 and 2022 from the online experimental database of Chatham House. More specifically, indicators from ecological network analysis and ascendency analysis were used to identity patterns which may not otherwise be directly identifiable, and to compare the network properties of the global waste trade to those of natural ecosystems. Focus was given on the distribution of monetary and material flows, on policy recommendations, and on future research avenues which we think are relevant for obtaining a more comprehensive understanding of socio-economic systems such as trade networks. This work provides a solid example of the application of network-based methods as an eco-mimicry approach for assessing the sustainability and fragility of socio-economic systems which can be of relevance to researchers and policy makers interested on transitions towards regenerative circular economies. • The global waste trade evolved both its size and complexity between 2000 and 2022 • There was substantial annual cycling of material and monetary flows • There was high network resilience and homogeneity but not sufficient robustness • The market was dominated by a few countries with more than 100 trade (import) links • Network-based methods can support the development of early warning mechanisms

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100550
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network properties of the global waste trade

Martin de Jong, Filippos K. Zisopoulos, Brian D. Fath, Xin Tong
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

Network properties of the global waste trade

Martin de Jong, Filippos K. Zisopoulos, Brian D. Fath, Xin Tong
article en

Abstract

The network properties of the global waste trade were assessed by using time series data of material and monetary flows between 2000 and 2022 from the online experimental database of Chatham House. More specifically, indicators from ecological network analysis and ascendency analysis were used to identity patterns which may not otherwise be directly identifiable, and to compare the network properties of the global waste trade to those of natural ecosystems. Focus was given on the distribution of monetary and material flows, on policy recommendations, and on future research avenues which we think are relevant for obtaining a more comprehensive understanding of socio-economic systems such as trade networks. This work provides a solid example of the application of network-based methods as an eco-mimicry approach for assessing the sustainability and fragility of socio-economic systems which can be of relevance to researchers and policy makers interested on transitions towards regenerative circular economies. • The global waste trade evolved both its size and complexity between 2000 and 2022 • There was substantial annual cycling of material and monetary flows • There was high network resilience and homogeneity but not sufficient robustness • The market was dominated by a few countries with more than 100 trade (import) links • Network-based methods can support the development of early warning mechanisms

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 25
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Peking University (CN), Masaryk University (CZ), Fudan University (CN), Towson University (US), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vereniging Trustfonds Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.