A Systematic Literature Review on Automated Scoring of Mathematical Constructed Responses

Automated scoring is a research field that facilitates constructivist educational evaluation by applying recently developed artificial intelligence technology to learner evaluation. As mathematics is an essential subject of the K-12 curriculum, research on automated scoring of constructed mathematical responses is of great importance. However, unlike research on automated scoring in other subjects’ responses, studies for automated scoring of mathematical responses still require further exploration. In this study, we propose classification criteria for mathematical constructed responses including response types and input types, identified 21 studies from 15 academic journals registered in SCOPUS with systematic literature review, and investigated them in detail. As a result, Research on automated scoring of mathematical constructed responses has gradually increased in the 2010s, and mainly focusing on algebra and functions, number and operations at the secondary school level. With the advancement of artificial intelligence technology, automated scoring models have also evolved from early rule-based and statistical-based models to machine learning-, deep learning-, and large language models. Furthermore, early automated scoring studies which focused solely on single-modal and digital formatted answers are progressing toward automated scoring of multi-modal and handwritten answers. Based on these findings, We propose a framework that can classify research based on response types and input data formats. Finally, we conclude by emphasizing the importance and necessity of research in automated scoring of constructed mathematical responses, and by providing suggestions for future research directions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2024.27.4.293
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Literature Review on Automated Scoring of Mathematical Constructed Responses

Minsu Ha, Sang Joon Kim
Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation
Software Engineering Research
article

A Systematic Literature Review on Automated Scoring of Mathematical Constructed Responses

Minsu Ha, Sang Joon Kim
article en

Abstract

Automated scoring is a research field that facilitates constructivist educational evaluation by applying recently developed artificial intelligence technology to learner evaluation. As mathematics is an essential subject of the K-12 curriculum, research on automated scoring of constructed mathematical responses is of great importance. However, unlike research on automated scoring in other subjects’ responses, studies for automated scoring of mathematical responses still require further exploration. In this study, we propose classification criteria for mathematical constructed responses including response types and input types, identified 21 studies from 15 academic journals registered in SCOPUS with systematic literature review, and investigated them in detail. As a result, Research on automated scoring of mathematical constructed responses has gradually increased in the 2010s, and mainly focusing on algebra and functions, number and operations at the secondary school level. With the advancement of artificial intelligence technology, automated scoring models have also evolved from early rule-based and statistical-based models to machine learning-, deep learning-, and large language models. Furthermore, early automated scoring studies which focused solely on single-modal and digital formatted answers are progressing toward automated scoring of multi-modal and handwritten answers. Based on these findings, We propose a framework that can classify research based on response types and input data formats. Finally, we conclude by emphasizing the importance and necessity of research in automated scoring of constructed mathematical responses, and by providing suggestions for future research directions.

Journal of Curriculum and EvaluationVol. 27(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.