Kewenangan Mahkamah Agung dalam Publikasi Pada Putusan Perkara Privat

This study examines the Supreme Court's authority to publish rulings on private cases and its impact on individuals' privacy rights. This authority, framed by transparency and data protection principles, is grounded in the right to public information per the Indonesian Constitution and Law No. 14 of 2008. However, publishing decisions in sensitive cases, such as divorce and domestic violence, risks violating individual privacy. This research addresses the urgent need to balance transparency and privacy by analyzing the legal basis and limitations on the Court’s authority. Through normative legal methods and legislative analysis, this study reviews key guidelines, including Supreme Court Decision No. 2-144/KMA/SK/VIII/2022, to recommend privacy protections for sensitive information in judicial rulings. Findings indicate that, despite a general obligation to disclose court decisions, exceptions must be made for sensitive data to safeguard privacy, contributing to a nuanced approach to judicial transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Humanity
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37504/lh.v2i3.659
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kewenangan Mahkamah Agung dalam Publikasi Pada Putusan Perkara Privat

Hufron Hufron, Vernita Kusuma Ningrum
Law and Humanity
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
article

Kewenangan Mahkamah Agung dalam Publikasi Pada Putusan Perkara Privat

Hufron Hufron, Vernita Kusuma Ningrum
article en

Abstract

This study examines the Supreme Court's authority to publish rulings on private cases and its impact on individuals' privacy rights. This authority, framed by transparency and data protection principles, is grounded in the right to public information per the Indonesian Constitution and Law No. 14 of 2008. However, publishing decisions in sensitive cases, such as divorce and domestic violence, risks violating individual privacy. This research addresses the urgent need to balance transparency and privacy by analyzing the legal basis and limitations on the Court’s authority. Through normative legal methods and legislative analysis, this study reviews key guidelines, including Supreme Court Decision No. 2-144/KMA/SK/VIII/2022, to recommend privacy protections for sensitive information in judicial rulings. Findings indicate that, despite a general obligation to disclose court decisions, exceptions must be made for sensitive data to safeguard privacy, contributing to a nuanced approach to judicial transparency.

Law and HumanityVol. 2(3)
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.