A gentle reminder: Should returns be interpreted as log differences?

It is rather a norm for researchers to directly use the log difference of an asset price to compute returns. However, this log return is only a conditional approximation of the actual returns. Next, do log difference approximations and the ln X + 1 common practices produce BLUE estimates? Using log return as an example, this study discusses the approximation nature and conditions for using the log difference approximation both for the interest regressor and control variables. These conditions are; that the sample average and variance of the original series both tend to zero. When these conditions are not met, the log difference approximation is, in fact, not a good approximation and biases OLS causal estimators. When the conditions are met, it produces unbiased, consistent but less efficient estimators. Thereby making the estimates less precise and less accurate. Nonetheless, this is true for a log differenced interest regressor(s) and control variables, when it correlates with the interest variable(s) and explains, in part, the dependent variable, even in large samples. Similarly, the common use of ln X + 1 biases the estimation of the true causal effect, even the intercept term. A robust solution of using subsamples produces unbiased and consistent estimators for the true causal effects under the causal assumptions. These biasedness, inconsistencies, and inefficiencies do not disappear in large samples. Finally, an ex-post estimation test statistic is suggested to confirm both the choice of using log difference approximation and for using ln X + 1 , in an empirical data causal regression analysis. Ideally, researchers should ensure the conditions for using the log difference approximation are met. Otherwise, these approximations produce biased, inconsistent, and inefficient results, even in large samples, leading to misinformed policy implications. • Returns are often misinterpreted and misrepresented as log differences in prices. • Systematic Difference; Log return is only but a conditional return approximation. • ln X + 1 is another suicidal common practice in empirical research. • Log return and ln X + 1 may result in biased and inconsistent estimators, nonetheless. • Good news; log returns can approximate returns correctly under some conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Financial Analysis
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103864
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A gentle reminder: Should returns be interpreted as log differences?

David Iheke Okorie
International Review of Financial Analysis
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

A gentle reminder: Should returns be interpreted as log differences?

David Iheke Okorie
article en

Abstract

It is rather a norm for researchers to directly use the log difference of an asset price to compute returns. However, this log return is only a conditional approximation of the actual returns. Next, do log difference approximations and the ln X + 1 common practices produce BLUE estimates? Using log return as an example, this study discusses the approximation nature and conditions for using the log difference approximation both for the interest regressor and control variables. These conditions are; that the sample average and variance of the original series both tend to zero. When these conditions are not met, the log difference approximation is, in fact, not a good approximation and biases OLS causal estimators. When the conditions are met, it produces unbiased, consistent but less efficient estimators. Thereby making the estimates less precise and less accurate. Nonetheless, this is true for a log differenced interest regressor(s) and control variables, when it correlates with the interest variable(s) and explains, in part, the dependent variable, even in large samples. Similarly, the common use of ln X + 1 biases the estimation of the true causal effect, even the intercept term. A robust solution of using subsamples produces unbiased and consistent estimators for the true causal effects under the causal assumptions. These biasedness, inconsistencies, and inefficiencies do not disappear in large samples. Finally, an ex-post estimation test statistic is suggested to confirm both the choice of using log difference approximation and for using ln X + 1 , in an empirical data causal regression analysis. Ideally, researchers should ensure the conditions for using the log difference approximation are met. Otherwise, these approximations produce biased, inconsistent, and inefficient results, even in large samples, leading to misinformed policy implications. • Returns are often misinterpreted and misrepresented as log differences in prices. • Systematic Difference; Log return is only but a conditional return approximation. • ln X + 1 is another suicidal common practice in empirical research. • Log return and ln X + 1 may result in biased and inconsistent estimators, nonetheless. • Good news; log returns can approximate returns correctly under some conditions.

International Review of Financial AnalysisVol. 97
Communication University of Zhejiang (CN), Centre for the Study of the Economies of Africa (NG), Hangzhou City University, University of Waikato (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.