S41 The Real-Time Nondrug Cost Savings of Switching Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Vedolizumab: A Time and Motion Study

Background: Vedolizumab, a standard biologic therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC), is traditionally administered intravenously. While the recent availability of subcutaneous (SC) vedolizumab has demonstrated comparable efficacy and drug cost savings, the associated non–drug-related costs have not been extensively studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess patient and healthcare provider time, as well as associated healthcare costs, associated with SC vedolizumab therapy. Methods: A prospective time and motion study was conducted in 34 UC patients switched from IV to SC vedolizumab. Data on infusion time, nurse time, pharmacy time, physician time, patient hospital time, and related costs were collected for IV vedolizumab. SC vedolizumab incurred no such costs. Results: A total of 34 patients were included in the study, of which 20 had ulcerative colitis. Vedolizumab was administered intravenously at intervals of 4 weeks (35%), 6 weeks (6%), and 8 weeks (59%). The mean infusion time was 35 minutes, with an average total patient time, including travel and hospital wait times, of 5 hours and 36 minutes. Healthcare provider time, including nurses (1.00 standard deviation, SD± 0.18 hours per infusion), pharmacists (0.18 standard deviation, SD± 0.03 hours per infusion), and physicians (0.33 SD ± 0.01 hours per infusion), significantly contributed to overall treatment costs. The average cost per IV infusion that included nurse (Saudi Arabia Riyal (SAR) 55.55 ± 16.02), pharmacy (SAR 19.25 SD ± 3.50), physician (SAR 42.40 SD ± 8.28), material supplies (SAR 99.87), facility and administrative costs (SAR 102.31) was approximately SAR 319.38. Therefore, the average annual cost per patient for IV infusions varied based on the infusion interval, with an overall average of SAR 3420.23. Patient productivity losses per infusion were estimated at SAR 383.94, adding SAR 2303.64 annually to the total nondrug costs. This resulted in a total nondrug cost of SAR 3606.06 per patient. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential for substantial time and cost savings with SC vedolizumab. By eliminating hospital visits, infusion-related personnel, and supplies, SC vedolizumab offers a more efficient and cost-effective treatment. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term impacts on patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001082696.25666.d9
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S41 The Real-Time Nondrug Cost Savings of Switching Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Vedolizumab: A Time and Motion Study

Yaser Meeralam, Mohammad S. Khan, Zaffar Malik, Salem Alotaibi et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S41 The Real-Time Nondrug Cost Savings of Switching Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Vedolizumab: A Time and Motion Study

Yaser Meeralam, Mohammad S. Khan, Zaffar Malik, Salem Alotaibi, Adnan Alzanbagi, Mohammed Shariff, Saad S. Alzahrani, Mona Alsaedi, Mohammed Sulaimani, Abdullah Samanudi
article en

Abstract

Background: Vedolizumab, a standard biologic therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC), is traditionally administered intravenously. While the recent availability of subcutaneous (SC) vedolizumab has demonstrated comparable efficacy and drug cost savings, the associated non–drug-related costs have not been extensively studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess patient and healthcare provider time, as well as associated healthcare costs, associated with SC vedolizumab therapy. Methods: A prospective time and motion study was conducted in 34 UC patients switched from IV to SC vedolizumab. Data on infusion time, nurse time, pharmacy time, physician time, patient hospital time, and related costs were collected for IV vedolizumab. SC vedolizumab incurred no such costs. Results: A total of 34 patients were included in the study, of which 20 had ulcerative colitis. Vedolizumab was administered intravenously at intervals of 4 weeks (35%), 6 weeks (6%), and 8 weeks (59%). The mean infusion time was 35 minutes, with an average total patient time, including travel and hospital wait times, of 5 hours and 36 minutes. Healthcare provider time, including nurses (1.00 standard deviation, SD± 0.18 hours per infusion), pharmacists (0.18 standard deviation, SD± 0.03 hours per infusion), and physicians (0.33 SD ± 0.01 hours per infusion), significantly contributed to overall treatment costs. The average cost per IV infusion that included nurse (Saudi Arabia Riyal (SAR) 55.55 ± 16.02), pharmacy (SAR 19.25 SD ± 3.50), physician (SAR 42.40 SD ± 8.28), material supplies (SAR 99.87), facility and administrative costs (SAR 102.31) was approximately SAR 319.38. Therefore, the average annual cost per patient for IV infusions varied based on the infusion interval, with an overall average of SAR 3420.23. Patient productivity losses per infusion were estimated at SAR 383.94, adding SAR 2303.64 annually to the total nondrug costs. This resulted in a total nondrug cost of SAR 3606.06 per patient. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential for substantial time and cost savings with SC vedolizumab. By eliminating hospital visits, infusion-related personnel, and supplies, SC vedolizumab offers a more efficient and cost-effective treatment. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term impacts on patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 119(12S)
King Abdullah Medical City (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.