Trends and Patterns on Religious Intolerance Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Numerous academics worldwide have been conducting research on religious intolerance (RI), and the level of work has increased since the 1990s. However, no prior research has employed bibliometric analysis to map this field. The objective of the bibliometric mapping of RI entails trends of publication, top and influential journals, top citation, top and influential countries, co-authorship between the countries, top and influential institutions. Data was obtained from the WOS database and analysed using frequency through Excel. To visualise influential journal, citation, co-authorship and overall link strength, VosViewer data analysis was used. The study found a consistent rise in the publication of research on RI between 2006 and 2017, with a significant peak in 2020. Religions emerged as the most influential journal, followed by Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Politics and Religion. The United States leads in RI research, followed by Australia and the United Kingdom. The University of California System, University of London, and Bar Ilan University are the top-cited institutions, with Bar Ilan University being the most influential. The study highlights the dominance of Western perspectives in RI research. Therefore, future research should incorporate a more diverse range of perspectives, particularly from Asian scholars that will provide comprehensive understanding of religious intolerance on a global scale.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i11/23486
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends and Patterns on Religious Intolerance Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Roslizawati Taib, Benny Thomas Vivian, Sivapalan Selvadurai, Venosha Ravana
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Religion, Society, and Development
article

Trends and Patterns on Religious Intolerance Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Roslizawati Taib, Benny Thomas Vivian, Sivapalan Selvadurai, Venosha Ravana
article en

Abstract

Numerous academics worldwide have been conducting research on religious intolerance (RI), and the level of work has increased since the 1990s. However, no prior research has employed bibliometric analysis to map this field. The objective of the bibliometric mapping of RI entails trends of publication, top and influential journals, top citation, top and influential countries, co-authorship between the countries, top and influential institutions. Data was obtained from the WOS database and analysed using frequency through Excel. To visualise influential journal, citation, co-authorship and overall link strength, VosViewer data analysis was used. The study found a consistent rise in the publication of research on RI between 2006 and 2017, with a significant peak in 2020. Religions emerged as the most influential journal, followed by Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Politics and Religion. The United States leads in RI research, followed by Australia and the United Kingdom. The University of California System, University of London, and Bar Ilan University are the top-cited institutions, with Bar Ilan University being the most influential. The study highlights the dominance of Western perspectives in RI research. Therefore, future research should incorporate a more diverse range of perspectives, particularly from Asian scholars that will provide comprehensive understanding of religious intolerance on a global scale.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 14(11)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.