Comparative Study between Portacath Placement in the Central or Peripheral veins for chemotherapy

Background: The conventional approach for central peripheral intravenous catheter [PaC] insertion involves the utilization of a central vein, such as the internal jugular or subclavian vein, often necessitating the administration of a general anesthesia. Aim of the work: To evaluate the safety and convenience of peripherally placed portacath catheters in comparison to central venous catheters for the administration of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Patients and Methods: A study employing a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial included 50 cancer patients at Al-Hussein and Sayed Galal University Hospitals and Menoufia University Hospital, during the period spanning from July 2023 to April 2024. Participants were assigned to one of two groups: Group A consisted of 25 patients who required the insertion of a central vein portacath catheter through the internal jugular veins using a portacath 8:10 f. Group B comprised 25 patients who required the insertion of a peripheral vein Portacath through the basilic veins, utilizing a portacath 3:5 f. Results: Group A and B exhibited a statistically significant disparity in terms of local infection, skin condition, and wound healing outcomes [p<0.05]. All individuals included in the study exhibited normal X-rays and free Doppler evaluations. A substantial statistical difference was seen between Group A and B in terms of hematoma at the axis location and arterial puncture [p-value <0.05]. A statistically significant disparity was seen between Group A and Group B in relation to various dimensions of comfort, anxiety induced by the device, disruption in daily activities, and overall satisfaction score [p<0.05]. Conclusion: The jugular portacath and basilic portacath techniques were both safe and effective for central venous catheterization [CVC] while administering chemotherapy. Furthermore, port catheters offer optimal vascular access for those diagnosed with cancer, hence enhancing their overall quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical Arts
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2024.315470.2025
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study between Portacath Placement in the Central or Peripheral veins for chemotherapy

Mohamed Hamza Hamed, Mohamed Abd El-Hamid Abd El-Rahman, Ramy Mohamed Abd El- Rahman Al-meshlawey
International Journal of Medical Arts
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Comparative Study between Portacath Placement in the Central or Peripheral veins for chemotherapy

Mohamed Hamza Hamed, Mohamed Abd El-Hamid Abd El-Rahman, Ramy Mohamed Abd El- Rahman Al-meshlawey
article en

Abstract

Background: The conventional approach for central peripheral intravenous catheter [PaC] insertion involves the utilization of a central vein, such as the internal jugular or subclavian vein, often necessitating the administration of a general anesthesia. Aim of the work: To evaluate the safety and convenience of peripherally placed portacath catheters in comparison to central venous catheters for the administration of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Patients and Methods: A study employing a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial included 50 cancer patients at Al-Hussein and Sayed Galal University Hospitals and Menoufia University Hospital, during the period spanning from July 2023 to April 2024. Participants were assigned to one of two groups: Group A consisted of 25 patients who required the insertion of a central vein portacath catheter through the internal jugular veins using a portacath 8:10 f. Group B comprised 25 patients who required the insertion of a peripheral vein Portacath through the basilic veins, utilizing a portacath 3:5 f. Results: Group A and B exhibited a statistically significant disparity in terms of local infection, skin condition, and wound healing outcomes [p<0.05]. All individuals included in the study exhibited normal X-rays and free Doppler evaluations. A substantial statistical difference was seen between Group A and B in terms of hematoma at the axis location and arterial puncture [p-value <0.05]. A statistically significant disparity was seen between Group A and Group B in relation to various dimensions of comfort, anxiety induced by the device, disruption in daily activities, and overall satisfaction score [p<0.05]. Conclusion: The jugular portacath and basilic portacath techniques were both safe and effective for central venous catheterization [CVC] while administering chemotherapy. Furthermore, port catheters offer optimal vascular access for those diagnosed with cancer, hence enhancing their overall quality of life.

International Journal of Medical ArtsVol. 0(0)
Al-Azhar University (EG), Menoufia University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.