The hemodynamic effects of ketofol versus fentanyl-propofol in neurosurgical operations

Background : Anesthesia for neurosurgical patients aims to maintain stable hemodynamics, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), appropriate cerebral oxygenation, and relaxed brain to facilitate surgical procedures. Objectives: evaluate the relative merits of fentanyl-propofol and ketofol as neurosurgical induction and maintenance anesthetics. Study design: The study was prospective, randomized, and double-blind, and forty adults took part. Method: xFor elective neurosurgery procedures, 40 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups and given general anesthesia. For induction and maintenance of anesthesia, one group received a mixture of ketamine and propofol, while the other group received a combination of fentanyl and propofol. Both groups had their intraoperative hemodynamic stability monitored. Results: ketofol (Group A) combination produced a significantly greater stability in pulse rate and in mean arterial pressure as compared to fentanyl (Group B) after induction of anesthesia (P=0.037) , (P=0.023) respectively and intraoperatively. Conclusion: Improved hemodynamic stability during induction and maintenance anesthesia without a rise in intracranial pressure is achieved with ketofol combination compared to fentanyl-propofol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minia Journal of Medical Research
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmr.2024.333444.1827
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The hemodynamic effects of ketofol versus fentanyl-propofol in neurosurgical operations

Ibrahim T. Ibrahim, Eron A. Faried, Amr N. Abdlrazek
Minia Journal of Medical Research
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

The hemodynamic effects of ketofol versus fentanyl-propofol in neurosurgical operations

Ibrahim T. Ibrahim, Eron A. Faried, Amr N. Abdlrazek
article en

Abstract

Background : Anesthesia for neurosurgical patients aims to maintain stable hemodynamics, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), appropriate cerebral oxygenation, and relaxed brain to facilitate surgical procedures. Objectives: evaluate the relative merits of fentanyl-propofol and ketofol as neurosurgical induction and maintenance anesthetics. Study design: The study was prospective, randomized, and double-blind, and forty adults took part. Method: xFor elective neurosurgery procedures, 40 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups and given general anesthesia. For induction and maintenance of anesthesia, one group received a mixture of ketamine and propofol, while the other group received a combination of fentanyl and propofol. Both groups had their intraoperative hemodynamic stability monitored. Results: ketofol (Group A) combination produced a significantly greater stability in pulse rate and in mean arterial pressure as compared to fentanyl (Group B) after induction of anesthesia (P=0.037) , (P=0.023) respectively and intraoperatively. Conclusion: Improved hemodynamic stability during induction and maintenance anesthesia without a rise in intracranial pressure is achieved with ketofol combination compared to fentanyl-propofol.

Minia Journal of Medical ResearchVol. 0(0)
Minia University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The hemodynamic effects of ketofol versus fentanyl-propofol in neurosurgical operations — Ibrahim T. Ibrahim, Eron A. Faried, et al. · Minia Journal of Medical Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS