Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Surface Topography of Interim Prosthodontics Fabricated Using 3D Printing Compared to CAD/CAM Systems (In-Vitro Study)

Background: In addition to the popularity of CAD/CAM milling systems, the use of 3D printing for the fabrication of interim prosthodontics has also become widespread. The materials used for 3D printing still need further investigation in regards to strength and surface topography. Objective: to evaluate fracture strength and surface topography of interim restorations fabricated by 3D printing systems compared to CAD/CAM milling systems. Materials and Methods: A preparation was performed on the first premolar and first molar of a mandibular typodont model cast, to resemble a three-unit all-ceramic fixed dental prosthesis (FDP). A digital design was then created using ExoCad software to create a digital master model. Two groups of interim fixed dental prosthesis (IFDP) were fabricated based on the virtual design. Group I: eight IFDP samples of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) were milled using CAD/CAM. Group II: Eight IFDPs were 3D printed using PMMA resin. The surface topography of samples was measured using a surface profilometer. The fracture strengths of the IFDPs were then assessed by a universal testing machine. Results: The difference in surface topography between both groups was statistically non-significant as revealed by student t-test (P=0.4499>0.05). The milled group recorded higher mean value of fracture strength than the 3D printed group. Student t-test (P=

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/jfcr.2024.255012.1068
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Surface Topography of Interim Prosthodontics Fabricated Using 3D Printing Compared to CAD/CAM Systems (In-Vitro Study)

Tamer Hamza, Jihan Farouk Younis, Bassem Eid
1 links
Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Surface Topography of Interim Prosthodontics Fabricated Using 3D Printing Compared to CAD/CAM Systems (In-Vitro Study)

Tamer Hamza, Jihan Farouk Younis, Bassem Eid
article en

Abstract

Background: In addition to the popularity of CAD/CAM milling systems, the use of 3D printing for the fabrication of interim prosthodontics has also become widespread. The materials used for 3D printing still need further investigation in regards to strength and surface topography. Objective: to evaluate fracture strength and surface topography of interim restorations fabricated by 3D printing systems compared to CAD/CAM milling systems. Materials and Methods: A preparation was performed on the first premolar and first molar of a mandibular typodont model cast, to resemble a three-unit all-ceramic fixed dental prosthesis (FDP). A digital design was then created using ExoCad software to create a digital master model. Two groups of interim fixed dental prosthesis (IFDP) were fabricated based on the virtual design. Group I: eight IFDP samples of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) were milled using CAD/CAM. Group II: Eight IFDPs were 3D printed using PMMA resin. The surface topography of samples was measured using a surface profilometer. The fracture strengths of the IFDPs were then assessed by a universal testing machine. Results: The difference in surface topography between both groups was statistically non-significant as revealed by student t-test (P=0.4499>0.05). The milled group recorded higher mean value of fracture strength than the 3D printed group. Student t-test (P=

Journal of Fundamental and Clinical ResearchVol. 4(2)
Badr University in Cairo (EG), Misr International University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.