PP40 Co-design and refinement of a logic model describing case management for people who frequently call ambulance services – the stretched evaluation
<h3>Background</h3> Multi-agency case management across the UK addresses the needs of those who call 999 ambulance services frequently (≥5 times in a month, or ≥12 times in a three-month period). However, there is little evidence about what works and how. STRETCHED (Strategies to Manage Emergency Ambulance Telephone Callers with Sustained High needs – an Evaluation using Linked Data) evaluated case management using mixed methods. One objective was to develop and refine a logic model to describe cross-sectoral case management and its expected impacts, as a basis for evaluation. <h3>Methods</h3> Stage 1: We conducted a stakeholder event with 37 people from Wales, England and Northern Ireland including public partners (with lived experience) and relevant staff to develop an initial logic model. Stage 2: Following the main data collection and analysis phases of the study, we reviewed and refined the logic model in the light of findings. <h3>Results</h3> The logic model summarises in graphic form: <b>Inputs:</b> resources and activities <b>Mechanisms of change:</b> at organisational and individual level <b>Impacts:</b> on service users, ambulance services, individual staff, and wider service networks. Study findings showed that: case management initiatives varied considerably between sites; patients had a high level of need with high mortality and rates of hospital admission; the conditions of many patients are not amenable to individual behaviour change. We then revised the logic model to show: the range of contextual/mediating factors shaping local initiatives variation in case management activities between sites a reduced emphasis on individual behaviour change. <h3>Conclusion</h3> In this challenging and complex area of health care, a logic model can be an essential tool to support evaluation, and refined on the basis of study insights.
Authors
- Robert Cole (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-7699)
- Bridie Evans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-0888)
- Helen Snooks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-8843)
- Adrian Edwards (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-4446)
- Theresa Foster (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-0885)
- Bethan Edwards (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-056X)
- Ashrafunnesa Khanom (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-6601)
- Alan Watkins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3804-1943)
- Penny Gripper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5957-7843)
- Rabeea’h Aslam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0916-9641)
- Robin Petterson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3448-9214)
- Ann Mary John (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-6995)
- Rachael Fothergill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-6200)
- Andy Rosser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5477-4269)
- Jason Scott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-2171)
- Nigel Rees (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-5335)
- Alison Porter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3408-7007)
- Chelsey Hampton
Institutions
- Northumbria University (GB)
- Swansea University (GB)
- Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust (GB)
- London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
- East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
- East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
- Cardiff University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Poster presentations
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-999.40
- Primary Topic
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00