PP18 Lost in transmission: risk negotiation in emergency medical dispatch

<h3>Background</h3> Accurate Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) of enhanced and critical care (ECCH) is essential for providing support to those who need it the most ensuring rapid intervention, equitable access, and cost-effective use of resources. But dispatch has also been recognised as the weakest link in the chain of response. The decision-making pathway of the stakeholders involved in the dispatch process is under-researched despite its significance. Our ongoing research looks into risk negotiation among operational and clinical teams involved in the process. <h3>Methods</h3> Our project is a cross-sectional, multi-method study led by an interdisciplinary team comprising medical professionals and sociolinguists. We collected four complementary datasets: audio recordings of the original emergency calls, audio recordings of spoken interactions between teams, Sequence of Events records, and policy documents and guidelines concerning ECCH. We analysed the data taking an Interactional Sociolinguistics approach, an established theory and methodology to examine patterns of language use in complex settings. We focused specifically on investigating communication practices that flag risk and show risk uptake. <h3>Results</h3> Risk negotiation, outside the caller-call handler dyad, is poorly understood. Our analysis indicates that: there are multiple risk points for information loss along the trajectory of dispatch decision making. Communication practices in this context have not been landscaped before; although they either impede the information flow, hence the accurate and speedy uptake of risk indicators; or promote interactional cohesion which facilitates the uptake and cascading of risk, enhancing dispatch decision making. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Interdisciplinary research contributes to risk assessment in EMD. Interaction analysis identifies risk points and can translate to evidence-based training that support the work of human actors involved in the dispatch decision making and the potential of AI systems. The findings of this work should also inform policy and enhance the regulatory frameworks that underpin the performance and evaluation of ECCH teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poster presentations
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-999.18
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP18 Lost in transmission: risk negotiation in emergency medical dispatch

David Lockey, Lauren Williams, Matthew Booker, Jo Angouri et al.
Poster presentations
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

PP18 Lost in transmission: risk negotiation in emergency medical dispatch

David Lockey, Lauren Williams, Matthew Booker, Jo Angouri, Shawnea Sum Pok Ting, Nigel Rees, David Rawlinson, Lyba Nadeem
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Accurate Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) of enhanced and critical care (ECCH) is essential for providing support to those who need it the most ensuring rapid intervention, equitable access, and cost-effective use of resources. But dispatch has also been recognised as the weakest link in the chain of response. The decision-making pathway of the stakeholders involved in the dispatch process is under-researched despite its significance. Our ongoing research looks into risk negotiation among operational and clinical teams involved in the process. <h3>Methods</h3> Our project is a cross-sectional, multi-method study led by an interdisciplinary team comprising medical professionals and sociolinguists. We collected four complementary datasets: audio recordings of the original emergency calls, audio recordings of spoken interactions between teams, Sequence of Events records, and policy documents and guidelines concerning ECCH. We analysed the data taking an Interactional Sociolinguistics approach, an established theory and methodology to examine patterns of language use in complex settings. We focused specifically on investigating communication practices that flag risk and show risk uptake. <h3>Results</h3> Risk negotiation, outside the caller-call handler dyad, is poorly understood. Our analysis indicates that: there are multiple risk points for information loss along the trajectory of dispatch decision making. Communication practices in this context have not been landscaped before; although they either impede the information flow, hence the accurate and speedy uptake of risk indicators; or promote interactional cohesion which facilitates the uptake and cascading of risk, enhancing dispatch decision making. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Interdisciplinary research contributes to risk assessment in EMD. Interaction analysis identifies risk points and can translate to evidence-based training that support the work of human actors involved in the dispatch decision making and the potential of AI systems. The findings of this work should also inform policy and enhance the regulatory frameworks that underpin the performance and evaluation of ECCH teams.

Poster presentations
Swansea Bay University Health Board (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.